UNFUCG
DashboardSearchChatBookmarksNotificationsActivityPremiumProfile
?
Home
Search
Chat
Saved
Profile
Episode
Is Space Milk the New Whey Protein? | What the Fitness | Biolayne
~4 min
Episode Brief·YouTube

Is Space Milk the New Whey Protein? | What the Fitness | Biolayne

Layne Norton
Watch on YouTube Add to chat My bookmarks← All sources

TL;DR

The four things you'd lose by not watching

4 items

TL;DR

The four things you'd lose by not watching

4 items
1

Baker's yeast protein (Space Milk) has a PDCAAS of 1.0 and an amino acid profile comparable to whey, but the study comparing it to whey showed no significant difference in muscle or strength gains, debunking the claim of outperformance.

2

The 'slow-release keeps you fuller longer' claim is unsupported — the study did not measure satiety, and slow digestion doesn't guarantee greater satiety.

3

Per 20 g of protein, Space Milk costs 30–40% more than a whey isolate like Outwork Nutrition with slightly more carbohydrates, making it a solid but not superior option for non-vegans.

4

Layne Norton demonstrates a critical evaluation framework: pull the cited study, scrutinize data presentation for p-hacking, check whether advertised benefits were actually measured, and factor in cost per gram of protein.

What's new

Personal practice updates, fresh positions, predictions

1 item

Space Milk (baker's yeast protein) as a plant-based alternative to whey

A new protein made from baker's yeast is marketed as outperforming whey, but a deep dive into the underlying study reveals equivalent results and unsubstantiated satiety claims; its amino acid score (PDCAAS 1) and profile make it the best plant protein Layne has seen, though it costs 30–40% more per gram of protein than whey isolate.

Why this matters: A rare plant-based protein with a perfect PDCAAS score and nearly whey-equivalent leucine content, yet the marketing overstates the evidence, underscoring how even high-quality ingredients get wrapped in misleading hype.

Background

Plant proteins often lack sufficient leucine or have lower PDCAAS scores, requiring larger doses or blends to match animal proteins. Space Milk enters as a novel yeast-derived isolate claiming to solve these issues and even surpass whey.

Layne went to the Space Milk website and examined the human study they cite. The trial compared baker's yeast protein, whey protein, and a placebo alongside resistance training. The charts were presented in a way that made whey look slightly worse, but closer inspection showed whey actually did numerically better for lean mass, while yeast did better on bench press and whey on leg press—none of these differences were statistically significant. Layne calls this pattern 'pee hacking' (p-hacking): test enough outcomes and a difference will eventually pop up, creating a false narrative of superiority. He emphasizes the study really tells us the two proteins are equivalent.

On the satiety claim: Space Milk says the protein is slow-release and therefore keeps you fuller longer, but the study never measured satiety. Slower digestion doesn't automatically translate to greater fullness, so the claim is unsupported by any data.

Amino acid analysis shows the yeast protein is very close to whey: leucine is about 10% lower, total essential amino acids less than 5% lower, and the PDCAAS is 1.0 (same as whey and egg). Layne states it's probably the best amino acid profile he has seen among plant proteins. For vegans or those with dairy allergies, it's a highly viable option. However, on a cost basis for the same benefit, you pay 30–40% more for Space Milk compared to a standard whey isolate (e.g., Outwork Nutrition), and you get slightly more carbohydrate per serving. He concludes the protein itself is good, but the marketing claims are overblown—it does not outperform whey.

Personal experience

Layne personally examined the study, the product website, and the amino acid data; he references his own brand, Outwork Nutrition, as the benchmark for cost comparison, noting he formulated a whey isolate that provides the same benefit at a lower price per gram of protein.

It is not better than whey and on a per cost basis for the benefits, you have to pay more to get the same benefit.

Also said
“They didn't assess satiety in this study. Just because something is a slow release and slower digesting doesn't mean it's going to have an effect on satiety.”— Directly refutes the product's satiety claim with a methodological flaw.
“I think this is, you know, kind of pee hacking where if you test enough things, you will find a difference in something.”— Identifies a common statistical fallacy used to create a narrative of superiority when the data show equivalence.
“For a plant-based protein, this is a very, very viable option. ... But when it comes to cost, if you're not plant-based ... you're going to pay 30 to 40% more for something like Space Milk.”— Balanced verdict: excellent plant option, but economically inferior for omnivores or those without dairy allergies.

Recommendations

Products, supplements, and tools mentioned in the episode

1 item

Critical supplement claim audit

Practice

Whenever a new supplement claims to outperform established options, perform a three-step audit: (1) go to the product website and find the cited study, (2) examine the actual data and charts for statistical significance and p-hacking, and (3) cross-check every marketing claim against the study’s measured outcomes and cost per gram of protein.

Layne’s deconstruction of Space Milk’s marketing is a template for skeptical consumers. He pulls the primary study, notices a visual presentation that makes whey look slightly worse, then inspects the numbers: lean mass slightly favored whey, bench press favored yeast, leg press favored whey – none statistically significant. He recognizes this as 'p-hacking', where testing many endpoints yields one that appears favorable by chance. He then isolates a claim never assessed in the study (satiety), noting that slow digestion alone doesn't establish a fullness benefit. Finally, he factors in real-world economics: what does this cost per unit of protein compared to the gold standard? The entire process takes minutes and arms the listener with a replicable framework for evaluating any new powder, pill, or potion that flaunts a single study.

vs alternatives

Contrasts with taking a company's claims at face value or trusting 'science-sounding' language without checking the actual evidence.

Personal experience

Layne narrates his own process: 'I went to the website for Space Milk, pulled up the study... if you actually look at how the chart is presented, whey protein actually did a little bit better in terms of lean mass.' He uses this as a demonstration of how he evaluates any product he critiques.

It's interesting in the caption, it says it's outperforming whey. I went to the website for Space Milk, pulled up the study.

Also said
“If you actually look at how the chart is presented, whey protein actually did a little bit better in terms of lean mass.”— Shows how data visualization can mislead, reinforcing the need to inspect raw numbers.
Find Critical
Disclosed sponsorships1speaker disclosed

Outwork Nutrition Whey Protein Isolate

Product Sponsored · disclosed

When comparing the cost-effectiveness of baker's yeast protein vs. whey, Layne brings up his Outwork Nutrition whey isolate: per 20 grams of protein, it costs 30–40% less than Space Milk and delivers same muscle-building outcomes.

DisclosureLayne Norton is the founder and formulator of Outwork Nutrition; he uses his own product as a cost benchmark and implicitly endorses it as a cheaper, equally effective alternative.

vs alternatives

Versus Space Milk (baker's yeast protein): Outwork whey isolate provides a very similar amino acid profile with slightly higher leucine, less carbohydrate, and is 30–40% cheaper per gram of protein while showing equivalent efficacy in resistance training studies.

Personal experience

He references it as 'my whey protein isolate build from Outwork Nutrition', indicating direct ownership and use.

Compared to like say my whey protein isolate build from Outwork Nutrition, per 20 grams of protein, you're going to pay 30 to 40% more for something like Space Milk or this baker's yeast isolate.

Find Outwork

Notable quotes

Lines worth pulling out — contrarian, specific, or perfectly phrased

4 items
It is not better than whey and on a per cost basis for the benefits, you have to pay more to get the same benefit.
Succinctly captures the core verdict: no performance advantage, economic disadvantage.
I think this is, you know, kind of pee hacking where if you test enough things, you will find a difference in something.
Calls out a common statistical trap in supplement studies with humor and clarity.
They didn't assess satiety in this study. Just because something is a slow release and slower digesting doesn't mean it's going to have an effect on satiety.
A direct, refutation of a popular mechanistic assumption that rarely gets dissected in product marketing.
For a plant-based protein, this is a very, very viable option.
Despite slamming the hype, he gives credit where due—acknowledging the amino acid quality and PDCAAS score.

Sign in to share feedback

Tell us if this brief hit the mark or missed it — feedback feeds back into the next iteration of the prompt.

Topics covered

space-milkbakers-yeast-proteinwhey-protein-isolatepdcaasstudy-critiquep-hackingsatiety-claimscost-effectivenessplant-proteinoutwork-nutritionmarketing-hypeamino-acid-profilemuscle-building
Free account

Make this library yours

Reading is free for everyone. A free account adds the personal layer: save protocols, follow experts, and see how the other experts weigh in on this same topic.

Create a free accountSign in

Where the experts disagree — weekly

One email a week: the sharpest new disagreements and protocols from the library. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Educational summary of the cited expert source — not medical advice. Open the source recording linked above and consult a qualified physician before acting on any protocol.