UNFUCG
DashboardSearchChatBookmarksNotificationsActivityPremiumProfile
?
Home
Search
Chat
Saved
Profile
Episode
It's Not Cholesterol. Inflammation Is What's Actually Causing Heart Disease
~80 min
Episode Brief·YouTube

It's Not Cholesterol. Inflammation Is What's Actually Causing Heart Disease

Mark Hyman
Watch on YouTube Add to chat My bookmarks← All sources

TL;DR

The four things you'd lose by not watching

4 items

TL;DR

The four things you'd lose by not watching

4 items
1

Heart disease is an inflammatory condition, not just a cholesterol plumbing problem — chronic stress, loneliness, poor sleep, and insulin resistance are root causes that standard care overlooks.

2

80% of heart disease and diabetes can be prevented with diet and lifestyle, yet only 3% of Americans meet the four core health behaviors (no smoking, 150 min exercise/week, whole foods diet, healthy body fat); 88% of US adults are metabolically unhealthy, including two-thirds of normal-weight individuals.

3

Standard lipid panels miss hidden risk: advanced testing (NMR/Cardio IQ) shows many people with 'normal' LDL have dangerously high particle numbers and small dense LDL, driven by insulin resistance — as seen in Mark Hyman’s 84-year-old patient with LDL 160 but particle number 1,500 and small LDL 900.

4

New tools include polygenic risk scores, retinal AI, and CT angiography with perivascular fat analysis (Caristo) that can predict heart attacks 15-fold before stenosis appears, while PCSK9 inhibitors and upcoming Lp(a) drugs offer potent alternatives to statins for high-risk individuals.

Protocols

Concrete recipes — what, when, how much, and why

5 items

Get an NMR (Cardio IQ) advanced lipid panel

WhatReplace the standard calculated LDL test with an NMR lipid profile (LabCorp) or Cardio IQ (Quest) that measures LDL particle number, size, and subfractions (VLDL, IDL, pattern A vs B).
WhenAt baseline, especially if you have family history of heart disease, insulin resistance, diabetes, or any metabolic red flags; repeat annually or as guided.
DoseOne‑time blood draw; interpretation requires a practitioner familiar with particle metrics.
For whomAnyone concerned about cardiovascular risk, particularly those with normal LDL but signs of metabolic dysfunction (belly fat, high triglycerides, low HDL, elevated insulin).
WhyStandard panels miss up to half of high‑risk patients because they don’t differentiate between large buoyant LDL (low risk) and small dense LDL (high risk), or measure particle number.
CaveatsNot always covered by insurance; many physicians won’t know how to act on results since there’s no drug that specifically targets small dense LDL — they must address the underlying insulin resistance with diet and lifestyle.

Cindy Guyer explains that LDL quality matters: pattern A (large fluffy) is relatively benign, while pattern B (small dense) is highly atherogenic. Mark Hyman presents a case of an 84‑year‑old man with LDL 160 — a “great” number — but particle number 1,500 (should be <1,000) and small LDL 900 (should be <300). This patient, who was thin and pre‑diabetic, had early dementia and would have been missed by standard care. Cindy adds that remnant particles (VLDL, IDL) are also hidden. Both experts insist that the NMR/Cardio IQ test should be standard; the delay in uptake is because medicine treats what it can easily measure and there’s no pill for small dense LDL. Addressing the root — insulin resistance — can dramatically improve the particle profile.

Mechanism

Small dense LDL particles are glycated and oxidized more easily, penetrate the endothelial barrier, and are poorly cleared by the liver. High particle number indicates abundant atherogenic lipoproteins even when total LDL mass is low. Both are driven by hyperinsulinemia and sugar/refined‑carbohydrate intake.

Personal experience

Mark describes the patient: “Even though his LDL … was 160 … they missed the boat because his particle number was like 1,500. … His small particles … was 900. Wow. So he was like and he was a skinny older guy was 84 years old and had you know lost muscle, belly fat, you know, underweight, over fat and he was pre‑diabetic.”

In 2021, no one should get their regular cholesterol panel. I mean, you you got insist from your doctor. You can get it from LabCore Quest. It's called NMR, Cardi IQ.

Also said
“LDL that's typically labeled the lousy cholesterol. There's big fluffy puffy pattern a LDL cholesterol which is less easily made into a plaque … somebody could have small dense pattern B LDL and that's the really risky LDL.”— Cindy’s biological explanation of why particle quality matters.
“So quality matters and if you have two people with a calculated LDL of 130, one of them could all have pattern a low‑risisk LDL and they're actually fine. somebody else could have lots of those dense particles that's not captured by the calculated LDL of 130.”— Demonstrates the clinical danger of relying on calculated LDL alone.

Measure fasting insulin and insulin response to a glucose challenge

WhatObtain fasting insulin and, ideally, perform a 2‑hour oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) with insulin levels at baseline, 1 hour, and 2 hours to uncover hyperinsulinemia while glucose is still normal.
WhenIf you have any sign of metabolic syndrome (central obesity, hypertension, high triglycerides, low HDL), a family history of diabetes or heart disease, or borderline fasting glucose; also as a comprehensive cardiometabolic baseline.
DoseFasting blood draw for insulin and glucose; then consume 75g glucose beverage and repeat insulin and glucose at timed intervals; performed in a lab.
For whomPatients with metabolic syndrome, unexplained weight gain, normal‑weight obesity, or those whose standard labs are ‘normal’ but still have symptoms.
WhyInsulin resistance drives inflammation, triggers small dense LDL production, and causes heart disease years before glucose or A1c become abnormal. Standard testing misses it entirely.
CaveatsVery few doctors order insulin; less than 1% of lab tests measure insulin. Interpretation requires knowing optimal ranges (fasting insulin <5 µIU/mL, post‑load <30). The glucose challenge may be cumbersome but is the gold standard for early detection.

Mark Hyman recounts a woman with severe central obesity and high cardiovascular risk whose fasting glucose, A1c, and OGTT glucose were pristine. Yet her fasting insulin was 50 (normal <5) and post‑drink peaked at 250. Her hyperinsulinemia was driving relentless hunger, fat accumulation, and inflammation. Once she eliminated starch and sugar, she lost 50 lbs and her risk profile normalized. Cindy Guyer adds that this insulin pattern correlates tightly with the small dense LDL, fatty liver, and neuropathy, all occurring before hyperglycemia. Mark cites the Quest lab director saying <1% of orders include insulin, illustrating the systemic blind spot. The protocol is to test, detect, and then treat the insulin resistance with carbohydrate restriction.

Mechanism

High insulin promotes fat storage in visceral adipocytes, which release inflammatory cytokines. It stimulates hepatic production of VLDL, leading to small dense LDL, and reduces nitric oxide bioavailability, impairing endothelial function. The pancreas compensates by pumping out more insulin to keep glucose down, masking the disease until beta‑cell failure.

Personal experience

Mark’s patient story: “Her insulin was like 50 fasting. Wow. And like 250 after a drink. So her body was just pumping out insulin which was making her hungry, slowing her tablets, putting fat in her belly cells, which were basically inflammation factories … she was able to lose 50 lbs like that when we cut out starch and sugar.”

Her insulin was like 50 fasting. Wow. And like 250 after a drink. So her body was just pumping out insulin which was making her hungry, slowing her tablets, putting fat in her belly cells, which were basically inflammation factories.

Also said
“I personally like to look at somebody's glucose trends over time … somebody whose fasting glucose runs less than 85 is in a very different metabolic place than somebody whose fasting glucose is 95 to 99.”— Cindy emphasizes that even within the ‘normal’ range, rising glucose signals risk.
“you can even do a normal glucose tolerance test and if you were super hyperinsulinemic, you're going to miss that patient's real problem.”— Reinforces that glucose alone is insufficient.
“That scenario is also associated with that cholesterol profile we talked about with the small dense LDL and low HDL … and it can happen with the high insulins alone before the sugars go up.”— Links hyperinsulinemia directly to the atherogenic lipid pattern.

Adopt the four core behaviors for heart disease prevention

WhatPractice the four evidence‑based habits: don’t smoke, get at least 150 minutes of moderate exercise weekly, eat a whole‑foods diet in the top two quintiles of diet quality, and maintain a healthy body fat percentage.
WhenDaily and ongoing as a lifestyle foundation, starting now.
DoseExercise: ≥150 min/week; diet: predominantly whole, unprocessed foods; body fat: healthy range (no specific % given, but not excessively overweight).
For whomUniversal – everyone benefits, especially those with a family history or metabolic risk factors.
WhyThese four factors are strongly predictive of low cardiovascular risk; meeting all of them slashes heart disease odds, yet only 3% of US adults achieve the bar.
CaveatsThe low adherence rate underscores the hostile environment (ultra‑processed foods, sedentary jobs, stress, poor sleep). Social support and systemic changes may be needed to sustain these habits.

Cindy Guyer presents the statistic that 80% of heart disease and diabetes can be prevented through diet and lifestyle, yet fewer than 3% of Americans meet these four factors — a shockingly low bar. Mark Hyman notes that our society is structured to cause heart disease, with chronic stress, loneliness, and sleep deprivation acting as silent drivers. The protocol is deceptively simple: no smoking, moderate activity, whole foods, and healthy weight. But because the medical system reinforces a pill‑for‑every‑ill model, these foundations are neglected. The message is that individual agency exists, but it requires consciously fighting the environmental forces pushing in the opposite direction.

Mechanism

Exercise enhances insulin sensitivity, reduces inflammatory cytokines, and improves endothelial function. A whole‑foods diet lowers glycaemic load, oxidative stress, and inflammation while supporting a healthy microbiome. Smoking cessation removes a potent endothelial toxin. Adequate body fat (especially low visceral fat) decreases the secretion of pro‑inflammatory adipokines.

fewer than 3% of the US population is meeting the core four basic characteristics that predict low risk. And it's a pretty low bar, Mark.

Also said
“It's not smoking. Getting the minimum recommended 150 minutes of exercise a week, eating in the top two quintiles of what's considered a whole foods diet, and having a healthy body fat percentage.”— Enumerates the four habits precisely.

Advanced cardiovascular risk stratification with polygenic risk, apoB, Lp(a), and imaging

WhatCombine a standard lipid panel with once‑in‑a‑lifetime measurement of ApoB and Lp(a), add a polygenic risk score and a ‘heart clock,’ and if high risk, consider CT angiography with perivascular fat AI (Caristo) or retinal AI.
WhenIdeally in your 40s or 50s, or earlier if you have a strong family history of premature heart disease.
DoseBlood tests (once for some components, periodic for others); CT angiogram (low radiation, one‑time or as needed).
For whomAnyone with multiple risk factors, strong family history, or those who want the most precise risk estimate.
WhyThese tools identify high‑risk individuals decades before a clinical event, allowing aggressive, targeted prevention that can drive LDL to <30 mg/dL and extinguish inflammation before plaque becomes obstructive.
CaveatsPerivascular fat analysis is not yet FDA‑approved (expected soon from Caristo). CT involves radiation and cost. Polygenic scores require expert interpretation. Not all components are widely available or reimbursed, but they are becoming more accessible.

Eric Topol describes the full stack: simple lipids plus ApoB and Lp(a) are the foundation. Adding an inexpensive polygenic risk score and a ‘heart clock’ provides a lifetime risk picture. For those flagged, retinal AI can predict Alzheimer’s and stroke, while CT angiography with Caristo’s AI sees inflammation in the absence of stenosis — carrying a 15‑fold heart attack risk. He says this allows us to ‘stamp out inflammation’ and aggressively lower LDL with PCSK9 inhibitors and upcoming LP(a)‑lowering drugs, while GLP‑1 agonists reduce inflammation before weight loss. This precision cardiology transforms heart disease from an inevitable fate into an optional condition, provided we screen early.

Mechanism

ApoB counts all atherogenic lipoproteins; Lp(a) is a genetically determined particle that promotes thrombosis and plaque. A polygenic risk score aggregates hundreds of common variants that influence atherosclerosis. Caristo uses AI on pericoronary fat to quantify inflammation — inflamed fat signals active plaque. Retinal AI detects microvascular changes that mirror coronary pathology.

If you have inflammation without a narrow, it's, you know, you could have 15fold risk of a heart attack.

Also said
“we can get a simple lipid panel add the LP little A apo B … polygenetic risk score very inexpensive we can also get a heart clock right and we can get inflammation markers … Now you have the full stack”— Details the layered risk assessment.
“you can do a retina AI exam. So I have a picture of the retina and you do AI on it and it tells you when you're going to have Alzheimer's … or a stroke”— Shows how one test can predict multiple age‑related diseases.
“the lifestyle factors work really well. This is the most preventable known of the three big age related diseases through lifestyle”— Reinforces that advanced tech complements, not replaces, lifestyle.

Address inflammation with lifestyle and consider GLP‑1 agonists if high‑risk

WhatIdentify and remove root causes of inflammation (diet, stress, sleep, infections, toxins, loneliness); in individuals with high residual risk, discuss GLP‑1 receptor agonists which lower inflammation independently of weight loss.
WhenAs an ongoing prevention strategy; GLP‑1 use if obesity, metabolic syndrome, or established cardiovascular disease and elevated inflammatory markers.
DoseLifestyle daily; GLP‑1 medication as prescribed (injection, variable dosing).
For whomPatients with elevated hs‑CRP, metabolic syndrome, obesity, or known coronary disease.
WhyInflammation is the core driver of plaque formation and rupture; reducing it via root‑cause resolution plus pharmacology can dramatically cut risk, as shown by trials of GLP‑1s in heart failure and cardiovascular outcomes.
CaveatsGLP‑1 agonists can cause nausea and have high cost. Lifestyle changes require sustained effort and systemic support. The combination should be individualized.

Cindy Guyer reminds us that 21 years ago, Libby and Ridker established the inflammatory nature of heart disease, yet the standard response is aspirin and statins without addressing upstream causes like stress, poor sleep, and loneliness. Eric Topol later notes that we now have the means to ‘stamp out inflammation’ — GLP‑1 drugs, which have been shown to prevent heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (half of all heart failure) and reduce events in diabetics and non‑diabetics, seem to do so largely via inflammation reduction before any weight loss occurs. Combined with lifestyle and the new diagnostic tools, this creates a unified strategy: measure inflammation, remove its sources, and pharmacologically quench it when high.

Mechanism

GLP‑1 agonists directly suppress the NLRP3 inflammasome and reduce visceral fat, lowering systemic cytokines. They also improve endothelial function and promote weight loss, reducing mechanical and metabolic stress on arteries. Lifestyle interventions similarly lower oxidative stress and inflammatory tone.

we can get o all the inflammation get all over it right in terms of bringing the inflammation down. Uh we've already seen how GLP1 drug do that before any weight loss.

Also said
“cardiovascular disease is an inflammatory process that it's not just about cholesterol, but there's ongoing inflammation”— Foundation of the inflammation‑centric approach.
“chronic stress, loneliness, isolation, bad sleep, those things are huge in heart disease”— Root causes beyond diet and exercise.

What's new

Personal practice updates, fresh positions, predictions

5 items

inflammation-heart-disease

early conversation with Cindy Guyer

Heart disease is fundamentally a chronic inflammatory process, not just cholesterol accumulation; high CRP identifies risk that standard lipids miss.

Why this matters: The inflammatory paradigm was established 21 years ago by Libby and Ridker, yet routine practice still treats only cholesterol and prescribes statins/aspirin without addressing inflammatory root causes.

Background

For decades, atherosclerosis was viewed as a plumbing problem — cholesterol build‑up requiring statins and bypass surgery. Inflammation was ignored because there was no drug to target it.

Dr. Cindy Guyer recalls the pivotal New England Journal of Medicine review in 2000 by Peter Libby and Paul Ridker that demonstrated cardiovascular disease is driven by ongoing inflammation. She notes that President Bush’s doctors measured his CRP but didn’t know what to do about it, epitomizing the clinical void. Mark Hyman reinforces that heart disease is “not a plumbing problem — it’s an immune problem.” The duo emphasize that inflammation itself is a symptom with many upstream drivers: stress, poor sleep, loneliness, infections, toxins, and insulin resistance. Yet the medical system defaults to a poly‑pill (aspirin, statin, blood pressure drug) instead of exploring these root causes. The segment challenges the audience to see heart disease as a result of systemic inflammation that can be quelled by lifestyle changes and addressing hidden insults.

cardiovascular disease is an inflammatory process that it's not just about cholesterol, but there's ongoing inflammation.

Also said
“President Bush's doctors measured his CRP, which is the common marker of inflammation, and they don't know what to do about it.”— Illustrates the clinical paralysis when faced with an inflammatory marker in the mainstream.
“chronic stress, loneliness, isolation, bad sleep, those things are huge in heart disease”— Lists non‑traditional inflammatory drivers that are pandemic yet rarely addressed.

metabolic-health-crisis

middle of Cindy Guyer segment

Only 12.2% of Americans are metabolically healthy, and fewer than one‑third of normal‑weight individuals are metabolically healthy; 88% of the population harbors some degree of metabolic dysfunction.

Why this matters: These NHANES-based numbers dwarf the obesity epidemic and show that normal BMI gives a false sense of security, explaining why heart disease remains the #1 killer despite statin use.

Background

Pre‑diabetes and type 2 diabetes affect one in two Americans, and 90% of pre‑diabetics are undiagnosed. Most doctors check only glucose and A1c, missing the insulin resistance that precedes rises in blood sugar.

Cindy Guyer cites the 2009‑2016 NHANES data showing that meeting optimal thresholds for blood pressure, HDL, triglycerides, and glucose classifies only 12.2% of Americans as metabolically healthy. Strikingly, fewer than one‑third of normal‑weight people met those criteria, meaning two‑thirds of “skinny” people are metabolically unhealthy and at risk. Mark Hyman extrapolates that practically nine out of ten Americans have some degree of pre‑diabetes or type 2 diabetes when insulin is considered, but doctors fail to test for it. This metabolic crisis drives heart disease independent of cholesterol, yet the healthcare system is built around treating end‑stage manifestations (high glucose, high LDL) with drugs rather than early detection of insulin resistance. The message: weight and basic labs are misleading, and metabolic dysfunction is rampant, preventable, and reversible.

They found that 12.2% of Americans … were metabolically healthy, which kind of means that almost 88% of Americans are metabolically unhealthy.

Also said
“Fewer than one‑third of so‑called normal weight people were metabolically healthy.”— Counter‑intuitive and undermines the reliance on BMI.
“So if you're a skinny sugar and bagel eater, don't think it's fine cuz you're skinny is basically the bottom line.”— Hyman’s plain‑language translation of the data.

insulin-hyperinsulinemia-missed

latter part of Cindy Guyer segment

Fasting insulin and insulin response to glucose challenge can detect severe hyperinsulinemia even when blood sugar and A1c are perfect; a woman with fasting insulin 50 and post‑drink 250 lost 50 lbs by cutting starch and sugar, reversing her high risk.

Why this matters: The case proves that standard glucose tests miss the root driver of cardiovascular disease, and that dietary removal of starch and sugar rapidly corrects the metabolic derangement.

Background

Most clinicians only check fasting glucose and A1c. Even when they do OGTT, they rarely measure insulin. As a result, millions of insulin‑resistant individuals are told they are fine until they develop diabetes and heart disease.

Mark Hyman vividly describes a patient with central obesity, high blood pressure, and high cardiovascular risk. Her fasting glucose, OGTT glucose, and A1c were perfect, but her fasting insulin was 50 (optimal <5) and after a glucose drink it soared to 250. Her body was pouring out insulin to keep glucose normal, creating a state of starvation at the cellular level — driving hunger, fat storage in visceral adipocytes, and systemic inflammation. Cindy Guyer points out that this hyperinsulinemic pattern is tightly linked to the small dense LDL profile, fatty liver, and neuropathy, all occurring while glucose remains normal. Mark cites the Quest lab director’s statistic that fewer than 1% of labs measure insulin, illustrating how completely the system overlooks this. The takeaway is that cardiovascular disease is fundamentally a hormonal and inflammatory problem rooted in insulin resistance, and early detection requires looking at insulin, not just sugar.

Personal experience

Mark’s patient story: “Her insulin was like 50 fasting. Wow. And like 250 after a drink. So her body was just pumping out insulin which was making her hungry, slowing her tablets, putting fat in her belly cells, which were basically inflammation factories … she was able to lose 50 lbs like that when we cut out starch and sugar.”

Her insulin was like 50 fasting. Wow. And like 250 after a drink. So her body was just pumping out insulin which was making her hungry, slowing her tablets, putting fat in her belly cells, which were basically inflammation factories.

Also said
“way before somebody's blood glucose goes up, they might be pumping out tons of insulin to try to keep it in a good place.”— Cindy highlights the silent compensatory phase.
“you can even do a normal glucose tolerance test and if you were super hyperinsulinemic, you're going to miss that patient's real problem.”— Clarifies that even OGTT glucose can be normal, necessitating insulin measurement.

ldl-cholesterol-dogma-debunked

Dr. Malhotra’s segment

Cardiologist Aseem Malhotra presents a systematic review of >30 industry‑sponsored trials showing no consistent relationship between LDL lowering and cardiovascular events, and Framingham data that LDL lost predictive value after adjustment for triglycerides and HDL.

Why this matters: Directly challenges the cornerstone of preventive cardiology, arguing that statins’ small benefit is likely from anti‑inflammatory and anti‑clotting effects, not LDL reduction.

Background

Since the 1950s, the diet‑heart hypothesis posited that saturated fat raises LDL, which clogs arteries. Statins were developed to lower LDL, and the ‘lower is better’ mantra became dogma, despite weak evidence and heavy industry influence.

Malhotra recounts how questioning the low‑fat obesity epidemic led him to investigate the cholesterol hypothesis. His 2013 BMJ piece “saturated fat is not the major issue” met backlash but proved prescient. He digs into Framingham: William Castelli, co‑director, found that unless LDL exceeded ~250 mg/dL, it was useless as a predictor after accounting for triglycerides and HDL. Then Malhotra and two other cardiologists systematically reviewed every randomized controlled drug trial — statins and PCSK9 inhibitors — and found no consistent relationship between how much LDL was lowered and cardiovascular event reduction, even in high‑risk patients. He further notes that in people over 60, observational data show an inverse association between LDL and all‑cause mortality, likely because cholesterol is vital for immunity, hormone production, and cell membranes. The editorial “saturated fat does not clog the arteries” in 2017, co‑authored with editors of JAMA Internal Medicine and BMJ Open, encapsulated the message: coronary disease is a chronic inflammatory condition, not a lipid storage disease.

Personal experience

Malhotra explains his professional journey: “my interest in this came from really looking at the initially the obesity epidemic … I concluded that one of the root causes … was this flawed hypothesis that we should have low‑fat diets to prevent heart disease.”

we did a systematic review of the totality of drug industry sponsored trials … over 30 studies was a relationship with lowering LDL and preventing cardiovascular events no even in high‑risisk patients

Also said
“Unless your LDL was above 7.8 mill moles … it absolutely had no it was useless as a predictor for coronary artis”— Cites the Framingham director’s own summary undermining LDL as a risk factor.
“there was an inverse association with LDL cholesterol and all cause mortality … the higher LDL, the less likely you are to die.”— Observational data in older adults that contradicts ‘lower is always better’.
“saturated fat does not clog the arteries. Coronary artery disease is a chronic inflammatory condition which can be effectively managed with lifestyle changes.”— Title of the widely downloaded 2017 editorial that encapsulates the shift.

new-cardiovascular-risk-detection

Eric Topol segment

Polygenic risk scores, ApoB/Lp(a), retinal AI, and CT angiography with perivascular fat AI (Caristo) can identify high‑risk individuals decades before events, and new drugs (PCSK9 inhibitors, Lp(a)‑lowering agents, GLP‑1 agonists) allow aggressive prevention.

Why this matters: These tools represent a paradigm shift from symptom‑based care to early molecular and imaging detection, enabling pre‑symptomatic intervention that could make heart disease optional for many.

Background

Traditional cardiology relies on stress tests and angiograms once symptoms appear, often too late. Most heart attacks occur in people with normal cholesterol, underlining the inadequacy of current screening.

Dr. Eric Topol outlines a layered risk assessment: start with a simple lipid panel plus Lp(a) and ApoB at least once, add an inexpensive polygenic risk score, and incorporate a “heart clock” along with inflammation markers. For those flagged as high risk, retinal AI exams can predict Alzheimer’s and cardiovascular events through fundus photography. Even more powerful, CT angiography with a new AI analysis of the fat surrounding coronaries (Caristo, an Oxford spin‑out) can detect inflammation without stenosis – a finding that confers a 15‑fold risk of heart attack. He advocates aggressive LDL lowering in such patients, targeting <30 mg/dL, using PCSK9 inhibitors and forthcoming Lp(a) drugs. GLP‑1 agonists reduce inflammation before weight loss and prevent heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Topol stresses that lifestyle remains foundational, but these tools give unprecedented agency to prevent the #1 killer.

If you have inflammation without a narrow, it's, you know, you could have 15fold risk of a heart attack.

Also said
“we can get a simple lipid panel add the LP little A apo B … polygenetic risk score very inexpensive we can also get a heart clock right and we can get inflammation markers … Now you have the full stack”— Shows the integrated assessment that wasn’t available before.
“you can do a retina AI exam. So I have a picture of the retina and you do AI on it and it tells you when you're going to have Alzheimer's … or a stroke”— Illustrates the convergence of imaging + AI for multi‑organ prediction.
“we can stamp out inflammation … we've already seen how GLP1 drug do that before any weight loss.”— Addresses inflammation pharmacologically, which was previously only targeted by statins/aspirin.

Recommendations

Products, supplements, and tools mentioned in the episode

2 items

NMR Lipoprofile / Cardio IQ advanced lipid panel

Tool

Cindy Guyer and Mark Hyman insist that everyone should get this panel instead of the standard calculated LDL test to reveal hidden atherogenic particle patterns.

Standard lipid panels calculate LDL, missing particle number and size. NMR (LabCorp) and Cardio IQ (Quest) quantify LDL‑P, small dense LDL, and remaining lipoproteins, unmasking individuals who appear low‑risk by conventional numbers but are actually at high risk due to insulin‑resistant dyslipidemia. Mark’s 84‑year‑old patient with ‘great’ LDL but particle number 1,500 and small LDL 900 exemplifies the clinical value. Though the test has existed for decades, uptake is low because many doctors don’t know how to use the information. This test is foundational for a functional medicine cardiometabolic work‑up.

vs alternatives

Compared to the standard lipid panel, it provides particle count and size, which are more predictive of events; it is more expensive and requires a knowledgeable interpreter but can prevent years of unnecessary statin use or false reassurance.

Personal experience

Mark’s patient case demonstrates how the test changed risk assessment dramatically.

In 2021, no one should get their regular cholesterol panel. I mean, you you got insist from your doctor. You can get it from LabCore Quest. It's called NMR, Cardi IQ.

Find NMR

Caristo AI CT perivascular fat analysis

Tool

Eric Topol describes Caristo, an Oxford University spin‑out, which applies AI to standard CT angiography to measure inflammation in the fat surrounding coronary arteries, identifying high‑risk plaques even without stenosis.

Caristo quantifies the fat attenuation index, reflecting the biological activity of nearby plaque. Topol explains that this inflammation‑based imaging predicts a 15‑fold increased risk of heart attack, far beyond what calcium scoring or conventional angiography can detect. The technology is pending FDA approval but is expected to become widely available. Combined with blood‑based risk markers, it allows physicians to decide who needs aggressive LDL and inflammation lowering. This represents the cutting edge of cardiovascular imaging and is a major advance over simply looking for narrowings.

vs alternatives

Compared to standard CT calcium score or angiogram, Caristo identifies non‑obstructive, inflamed plaques that are the source of most heart attacks, which traditional imaging misses.

If you have inflammation without a narrow, it's, you know, you could have 15fold risk of a heart attack.

Also said
“this is a a a Oxford University of Oxford spinout. I think it's called Carista.”— Identifying the origin of the technology.
“CT angio which is now becoming very inexpensive uh and you can look at inflammation in the artery … It does AI of the fat around the artery”— Explains the method.
Find Caristo
Disclosed sponsorships1speaker disclosed

Function Health

Service Sponsored · disclosed

Mark Hyman co‑founded Function Health to offer direct‑to‑consumer access to deep biomarker testing including fasting insulin, OGTT with insulin, advanced lipid panel, ApoB, Lp(a), hs‑CRP, and more, addressing the systemic under‑testing of these critical markers.

DisclosureMark Hyman is a co‑founder of Function Health.

Function Health aims to close the gap between what standard medicine offers and what functional medicine requires for early detection of cardiometabolic disease. It provides a comprehensive panel that includes the very tests discussed throughout the episode — insulin sensitivity metrics, advanced lipids, and inflammatory markers — at scale and with user‑friendly interpretation. The service is built on the premise that less than 1% of routine labs measure insulin, and that patients must take proactive steps to uncover their true risk. By bundling these tests, Function Health enables individuals to monitor their metabolic health trajectory and make lifestyle and medical decisions before disease manifests.

vs alternatives

Unlike annual physicals or basic lab panels covered by insurance, Function Health offers a far more extensive set of cardiometabolic biomarkers, but it is a paid service and may not be covered by insurance; it also provides longitudinal tracking and contextual guidance aligned with functional medicine.

Personal experience

Mark states: “it's part of why I co‑ounded this company, Function Health, to really look at a deep biomarker set around cardioabolic risk factors, including insulin, including LP little A, including something called Apo B.”

it's part of why I co‑ounded this company, Function Health, to really look at a deep biomarker set around cardioabolic risk factors, including insulin, including LP little A, including something called Apo B

Also said
“less than 1% of your tests you get to come in are measuring insulin”— Quote from the Quest lab director highlighting the massive under‑testing that Function Health seeks to rectify.
Find Function

Notable quotes

Lines worth pulling out — contrarian, specific, or perfectly phrased

8 items
cardiovascular disease is an inflammatory process that it's not just about cholesterol, but there's ongoing inflammation
Declares the central paradigm shift: cholesterol is a side‑show, inflammation is the disease.
fewer than 3% of the US population is meeting the core four basic characteristics that predict low risk
Stark statistic that illustrates the failure of lifestyle adoption despite its power.
In 2021, no one should get their regular cholesterol panel. I mean, you you got insist from your doctor. You can get it from LabCore Quest. It's called NMR, Cardi IQ.
A direct, actionable call to abandon outdated standard of care in favor of advanced lipid testing.
Her insulin was like 50 fasting. Wow. And like 250 after a drink. So her body was just pumping out insulin which was making her hungry, slowing her tablets, putting fat in her belly cells, which were basically inflammation factories
Vivid clinical anecdote showing how profoundly hyperinsulinemia can hide behind normal glucose and A1c.
If you have inflammation without a narrow, it's, you know, you could have 15fold risk of a heart attack.
Quantifies the new imaging paradigm — inflammation matters more than stenosis.
we did a systematic review of the totality of drug industry sponsored trials … over 30 studies was a relationship with lowering LDL and preventing cardiovascular events no even in high‑risisk patients
Bombshell from an interventional cardiologist that undermines the rationale for most statin prescribing.
saturated fat does not clog the arteries. Coronary artery disease is a chronic inflammatory condition which can be effectively managed with lifestyle changes.
The title of the 2017 editorial that crystallises the anti‑dogma message.
the level of this control and power … big corporations in this case big farmer … they want to avoid the truth coming out.
Directly calls out commercial distortion of science as the reason LDL dogma persists.

Sign in to share feedback

Tell us if this brief hit the mark or missed it — feedback feeds back into the next iteration of the prompt.

Topics covered

heart-diseaseinflammationcholesterol-mythmetabolic-healthinsulin-resistanceadvanced-lipid-testingpolygenic-riskai-imaginglifestyle-preventionstatin-side-effectssaturated-fatcommercial-distortionfunctional-medicine
Free account

Make this library yours

Reading is free for everyone. A free account adds the personal layer: save protocols, follow experts, and see how the other experts weigh in on this same topic.

Create a free accountSign in

Where the experts disagree — weekly

One email a week: the sharpest new disagreements and protocols from the library. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Educational summary of the cited expert source — not medical advice. Open the source recording linked above and consult a qualified physician before acting on any protocol.