UNFUCG
DashboardSearchChatBookmarksNotificationsActivityPremiumProfile
?
Home
Search
Chat
Saved
Profile
Episode
Exercise Scientist Critiques UNBEATABLE CrossFit Champion
~22 min
Episode Brief·YouTube

Exercise Scientist Critiques UNBEATABLE CrossFit Champion

Mike Israetel
Watch on YouTube Add to chat My bookmarks← All sources

TL;DR

The four things you'd lose by not watching

4 items

TL;DR

The four things you'd lose by not watching

4 items
1

Tia-Clair Toomey, 7-time CrossFit Games champion (the most overall), trains 4–5 sessions a day including a 15K run and heavy strength work under fatigue to mimic unpredictable Games demands.

2

Her weightlifting background gave her a massive advantage: the sport’s movements, derivatives, and unique strength–flexibility physical qualities are foundational to CrossFit.

3

Elite CrossFitters practice skills like handstand walks regularly pre-competition not to improve but to avoid rust, because fitness is already peak but neural skill can degrade quickly.

4

Dr. Mike Israetel recommends using recovery wearable scores as multi-day trend data rather than daily decision drivers, and he endorses Element electrolyte drink for intense training hydration.

Protocols

Concrete recipes — what, when, how much, and why

5 items

Maintain skills frequently to prevent rust during competition prep

WhatRegularly practice a wide variety of sport-specific skills (e.g., handstand walking, gymnastics) even when physical fitness is already peaked, focusing on neural readiness rather than improvement.
WhenDuring the specific preparation phase leading into a major competition with unknown events (e.g., CrossFit Games).
DosePepper in sessions ‘quite regularly’—likely multiple times per week, per the coach’s structure—without a fixed progression overload.
For whomAdvanced athletes in sports with unpredictable, broad skill demands, especially CrossFit competitors near their peak event.
WhyPhysical fitness (muscles, connective tissue, cardiorespiratory system) is already maximal; neural skill can degrade in weeks without practice, so the goal is to make sure you don’t get worse.
CaveatsThis approach does not aim to improve skills; it only prevents regression. Off-season or early season phases should still focus on skill development.

Tia’s coach, Shane, has them hit skills like handstand walking regularly even though they may not come up. Dr. Mike explains that the physical machine is ready, but ‘the knowledge of how to do handstand walks, if you haven't done them in weeks, you could be rusty.’ In a sport where the events are a mystery until game time, any rust could be catastrophic. So the protocol is a deliberate shift from training to improve to training to maintain. He notes that most programs would normally continue to push skill gains, but the timing and the sport’s nature demand this inversion.

Mechanism

Motor skills are stored as neural patterns that degrade without rehearsal; in contrast, physiological qualities like strength and endurance detrain more slowly. Thus, frequent low-volume practice sustains the ‘software’ even when the ‘hardware’ is already optimized.

You're just trying to make sure you don't get worse.

Also said
“The machine is ready. But the knowledge of how to do handstand walks, if you haven't done them in weeks, you could be rusty and the last thing you want to be rusty is at the only place it matters, which is at the CrossFit Games.”— Frames the risk of rust as the core problem this protocol solves.
“They may never come up or they may come up. That's super important. You never quite know what the events are going to be at the CrossFit Games.”— Emphasizes the environmental uncertainty that makes this maintenance critical.

Alternate fresh and fatigued strength sessions in competition prep to match event demands

WhatProgram some strength/strongman sessions after metabolic conditioning to simulate the fatigue state typical of CrossFit Games events, while still keeping other days where strength is performed fresh to continue building maximal strength.
WhenIn the specific competition-preparation block (weeks before the Games).
DoseTia’s lifting is prioritized first three times a week, and on other days lifting follows conditioning. The exact ratio depends on individual fatigue management but follows the principle of mixing fresh and fatigued exposures.
For whomCompetitive CrossFit athletes; applicable to any athlete whose competition involves strength performance under pre-existing fatigue.
WhyIf you always train strength while fresh, you will not be technically or psychologically prepared to perform strength skills under the fatigue that the Games impose; conversely, if you never lift fresh, you lose the ability to build top-end strength.
CaveatsThis should only be used in the immediate pre-competition phase. In the off-season, traditional sequencing (strength before conditioning) maximizes adaptations. Monitoring recovery is crucial to avoid overreaching when adding fatigued strength work.

Dr. Mike walks through the coach’s reasoning: usually you do strength first because that sequence builds strength and endurance best. But because the CrossFit Games typically put the Metcon (longer conditioning piece) first and the heavy stuff later, athletes must know how to adjust. Tia’s program retains fresh strength days to continue pushing her absolute strength ceiling, while the fatigued strength days teach her body and mind what it feels like to perform heavy lifts when exhausted. Mike says that without this simulation, an athlete would be ‘out of their mind—your hips feel weird, your legs feel weird, your technique feels off’ on game day. The hybrid approach preserves both adaptation and specificity.

Mechanism

Motor learning is state-dependent; repeatedly executing complex lifts in a fatigued state makes the movement robust under that condition. Psychologically, familiarity reduces anxiety and preserves technique under duress. The fresh sessions continue to drive neuromuscular and hypertrophic strength adaptations.

Personal experience

Dr. Mike reflects that he has done three workouts in a day, but never a heavy strongman session as the third session, highlighting the extreme demand of this protocol.

If you train strength work always before your metabolic conditioning work, if you are asked to do strength work after metcons in the same event, you are going to be out of your mind. Your hips feel weird, your legs feel weird, your technique feels off.

Also said
“If this be the off season or if this be any other time, but because we're in Games prep, it's just important for the athlete to lift under fatigue.”— The coach’s direct justification for why the sequence changes for this phase.
“We still have a linear progression where I am prioritizing lifting first and that that happens three times a week. We're lifting and weightlifting comes first. Excellent. Amazing. Still prioritizing every now and again to continue to get stronger cuz it's the best way to get stronger is to do it first.”— Shows how they avoid losing strength development while still simulating fatigue on other days.

Use recovery scores as a multi-day trend tool, not a single-day decision maker

WhatTrack recovery metrics from wearables over multiple days and only adjust training when low scores coincide with performance decline and disrupted sleep for several days.
WhenDaily, as part of morning monitoring.
DoseReview a rolling 3+ day trend; do not change today’s workout based on a single bad score.
For whomAny athlete using a wearable recovery tracker.
WhySingle-day readings can be noisy and inaccurate; a sustained pattern plus subjective and performance data gives a more reliable signal of overreaching.
CaveatsThe metric must still correlate with how you actually feel and perform; if it never aligns, the specific device may not be useful for you.

Dr. Mike was asked about the recovery metric after Tia showed a bad night. He says it’s ‘way better than nothing,’ but he would not use it like ‘chicken bones on the ground to predict how your workout's going to go.’ His framework is to carry on with the planned session despite a single low score. Only when low scores stack for several days, performance drops, and sleep is disrupted does he conclude it’s true under-recovery. The remedy is reducing training volume, increasing rest, food, and sleep. He emphasizes not making daily reactive decisions, which would disrupt the training plan.

Mechanism

Wearable recovery estimates are algorithmic composites of heart rate variability, sleep, etc., which have high day-to-day variability. Averaging over time filters noise, making the signal more representative of systemic fatigue and readiness to train.

What I wouldn't do is go and looking at the recovery score like, you know, the chicken bones on the ground to predict how your workout's going to go. I would use that as a longer-term tracking tool, seeing how well does it predict, and I would use it on a multi-day basis.

Also said
“If your recovery score sucks a few days in a row and you're starting to underperform and you feel like crap and your sleep is disrupted, then that probably isn't psychological and it's probably no adjustment to make other than to reduce your training volume, get more rest, get more food, get more sleep, and then get back on the horse.”— The concrete decision tree for acting on poor recovery trends.

Pulsatile carbohydrate and fluid intake during long multi-session training days

WhatConsume large amounts of carbohydrates and fluids in repeated, small pulses during and after every workout to sustain performance across multiple daily sessions.
WhenOn days with three or more intense training bouts.
DoseNot specified quantitatively in this video, but the principle is ‘lots of carbohydrates’ and ‘plenty of fluids’ in a pulsatile manner.
For whomEndurance and hybrid athletes training multiple times per day, especially in the heat.
WhyHigh-volume, multi-session training rapidly depletes glycogen and water; continuous replenishment is required to prevent performance crashes in later sessions.

While watching Tia’s third session (strongman at 1pm), Dr. Mike remarks on the necessity of advanced sport nutrition when training at this level. He doesn’t go into deep detail, but frames it as critical for maintaining high performance throughout a day that began with a 15km run. The pulsatile approach means not just a single huge post-workout meal, but frequent smaller feedings/hydration pulses to keep fuel status topped off.

Advanced sport nutrition where you eat lots of carbohydrates and taking plenty of fluids in a pulsatile manner during and after each workout is critical here to maintain high performance.

Monitor sleep disruption as a potential overreaching signal

WhatPay attention to nights of poor sleep (lying awake, disrupted patterns) during heavy training blocks as they can indicate insufficient recovery.
WhenDuring high-volume training periods (e.g., pre-competition).
DoseWatch for multiple nights; a single bad night may just happen.
For whomAny athlete in a heavy training phase.
WhyA classic sign of overreaching is disturbed sleep, so it serves as an early warning to reduce load.
CaveatsNot every poor night means overreaching; occasional sleeplessness is normal and harmless.

Noticing Tia say she went to bed at 8:30 but lay watching the ceiling fan until 12:30, Dr. Mike says, ‘I hope she's not overreached. A sign of doing a lot of training and not recovering is a disrupted sleep pattern. And sometimes it just happens, though.’ He treats it as a yellow flag rather than a definite alarm.

Mechanism

Overreaching can elevate sympathetic nervous system activity and stress hormones, making it difficult to fall and stay asleep.

A sign of doing a lot of training and not recovering is a disrupted sleep pattern. And sometimes it just happens, though.

What's new

Personal practice updates, fresh positions, predictions

4 items

weightlifting-background-advantage-for-crossfit

Tia’s background in the sport of weightlifting (the Olympic lifts) gave her three huge edges that explain why many top CrossFitters come from that discipline.

Why this matters: It clarifies why a strength-sport base translates so directly to the mixed-modal demands of CrossFit, beyond just ‘being strong’.

Background

Weightlifting has long been a pipeline for American CrossFit success; Tia is the latest example of a high-level weightlifter dominating the Games.

Dr. Mike breaks the advantage into three components. First, the actual weightlifting movements—snatch, clean & jerk—are literally contested in CrossFit events, so technical proficiency transfers directly. Second, many other CrossFit movements are derivatives: squats, push presses, overhead stability patterns all stem from weightlifting and build a broad strength base. Third, weightlifting uniquely develops a combination of strength and flexibility that is hard to get from other sports. He also playfully notes the terminology: call a weightlifter an ‘Olympic lifter’ or confuse them with a bodybuilder/powerlifter, and they will be deeply offended.

Coming into CrossFit sport from a background in weightlifting is a huge huge advantage because so much as CrossFit is based on three things you get from weightlifting.

Also said
“One, they literally will do the weightlifting movements in the competitions. Two, a lot of the movements they do are the derivatives of weightlifting, things like squats, push presses, etc. And three, weightlifting makes you strong and flexible in a way that almost nothing else does.”— The precise breakdown of the three advantages that form the full argument.
“Now, if you ever call a weightlifter an Olympic lifter, they're liable to be upset. And if you call them a bodybuilder or powerlifter, holy So, if you introduce your friend that's been to the Olympics or that's done weightlifting as an Olympic powerlifter, you're probably getting your snatch cleaned.”— Adds cultural context showing how important the sport's identity is and that expertise is tightly defined.

skill-maintenance-not-improvement-in-peak-season

For advanced athletes like Tia, skill work before the Games is about preserving neural proficiency rather than chasing new technical gains, because physical readiness is already maxed.

Why this matters: It challenges the common assumption that athletes always need to ‘get better’—at the top, avoiding loss is the priority.

Tia’s coach, Shane, has them practice a wide variety of skills (handstand walking, gymnastics) regularly in the build-up to the Games. Dr. Mike explains that an athlete’s fitness—muscles, bones, connective tissues, cardiorespiratory system—are already fully developed. However, the neural skill of complex movements can degrade in a few weeks without practice. Since the CrossFit Games events are unknown until shortly before competition, an athlete cannot afford to be rusty on any movement. So the goal shifts from skill improvement to maintenance: ‘you’re just trying to make sure you don’t get worse.’ This is a strategic pivot from classical periodization where you’d continue to overload skills.

You may never be training the skills as a real advanced athlete with enough succession in time, like weeks and weeks and weeks on end to get much better at them. You're just trying to make sure you don't get worse.

Also said
“The machine is ready. But the knowledge of how to do handstand walks, if you haven't done them in weeks, you could be rusty and the last thing you want to be rusty at is the only place it matters, which is at the CrossFit Games.”— Illustrates the specific risk of rust and why maintenance is non-negotiable.
“Shane just always makes us do stuff like that. Like particularly come Games time we're always doing different skills just to make sure we've touched on them. They may never come up or they may come up.”— Confirms the coach’s deliberate tactic and the uncertainty that drives it.

low-resting-heart-rate-physiology

A resting heart rate of 48 bpm (and possibly 44-45 near Games) reflects extreme aerobic fitness and overall health, explained by three physiological adaptations.

Why this matters: It gives a clear, non-jargon mechanism for why elite endurance athletes exhibit such low heart rates, contrasting with unhealthy states.

Dr. Mike breaks down Tia’s 48 bpm as ‘phenomenal shape.’ He explains that months and months of hard training produce very oxygen-rich blood with high red blood cell counts, efficient at gas exchange and waste removal. Peripheral tissues become highly efficient at using oxygen, so when at rest they need less blood flow. The heart itself remodels to pump a large volume per beat (high stroke volume). Combined, these mean the body can sustain life with far fewer beats per minute. In contrast, poor health means the body demands more fuel and waste processing, blood is less capable, and the heart pumps little per beat, leading to a high resting heart rate, which is a poor health marker. He notes some gifted athletes can push into the 200s for max heart rate, but resting rates below 50 are exceptional.

Personal experience

Dr. Mike jokes that his own resting heart rate is ‘like 120,’ highlighting the extreme difference between elite and typical populations.

A lower resting heart rate usually indicates that you are very good athlete in the aerobic sense, and also that you are in very, very good health.

Also said
“If you have very oxygen-rich blood from months and months of training really hard. Lots of red blood cells to carry oxygen and get rid of wastes. If your peripheral tissues are incredibly efficient with oxygen, that means when they're working really hard they can process a crap load of it. When they're not working so hard, they don't really need as much blood.”— The direct physiological explanation of why oxygen delivery and peripheral efficiency lower resting demand.
“When the heart is so big and strong in the best way that each beat pumps a crap load of blood, all those things add up to being like you just don't need that many beats to stay alive.”— Completes the stroke volume component of the argument.

recovery-score-interpretation

Wearable recovery metrics should be used as multi-day trend data, not as a daily oracle to alter training on the spot.

Why this matters: Many athletes overreact to a single red score; Dr. Mike provides a practical decision-making framework that avoids under-training or ignoring true overreaching.

After Tia shows a poor night’s sleep and a low recovery score, Dr. Mike is asked about recovery metrics from wristbands. He states they are ‘way better than nothing’ but must be validated against subjective feel and performance, as they can sometimes be ‘way off.’ His protocol is explicitly not to look at a single bad day and adjust. Instead, track the metric over multiple days. If the score is low for several days consecutively, performance is declining, and sleep is disrupted, that pattern is likely real overreaching and the only adjustment is to reduce training volume, increase rest, food, and sleep. This use of the tool as a trend detector rather than a coach-on-your-wrist is critical for serious athletes.

What I wouldn't do is go and looking at the recovery score like, you know, the chicken bones on the ground to predict how your workout's going to go. I would use that as a longer-term tracking tool, seeing how well does it predict, and I would use it on a multi-day basis.

Also said
“If your recovery score sucks a few days in a row and you're starting to underperform and you feel like crap and your sleep is disrupted, then that probably isn't psychological and it's probably no adjustment to make other than to reduce your training volume, get more rest, get more food, get more sleep, and then get back on the horse.”— The actionable decision rule that turns the metric into a practical intervention.

Recommendations

Products, supplements, and tools mentioned in the episode

1 item

Recovery wristband wearables (generic)

Tool

Dr. Mike endorses the general category of wrist-worn recovery trackers as useful tools for long-term monitoring, provided their scores are validated against feel and performance.

When asked about Tia’s recovery metric, Dr. Mike says these devices are ‘way better than nothing.’ He cautions that they can be ‘way off’ and must correlate with subjective and objective data to be trusted. However, for athletes at the level where it matters, they are a ‘really good tool in the toolbox.’ He doesn’t name a specific brand, making this a general endorsement of recovery wearables rather than a specific model recommendation.

vs alternatives

Implicitly compared to having no objective recovery data; better than nothing but inferior to combining the device’s data with self-awareness.

Way better than nothing. Has to correlate with how you actually feel and perform. Sometimes they're way off. But I would say a really good tool in the toolbox if you're at this level and it really matters.

Find Recovery
Disclosed sponsorships2speaker disclosed

Element Electrolyte Drink (reformulated canned version)

Supplement Sponsored · disclosed

Recommended as an optimal hydration solution for multi-session training in the heat, like a full day of CrossFit workouts, because it replenishes fluids and salts rapidly.

DisclosureDr. Mike has a sponsorship arrangement with Element; the segment is a paid ad read.

Dr. Mike pitches Element as the perfect hydration tool for athletes like Tia who train multiple sessions in hot conditions and lose large amounts of sweat. He describes a recent product improvement: their canned product previously had a high salt-to-fluid ratio that was not maximally palatable or effective; they re-engineered it to half the salt concentration, making it tastier and more optimally hydrating. He jokes about secret labs on Uranus but underscores that the reformulation is a genuine R&D outcome. The use case is explicitly any athlete who needs rapid rehydration between demanding workouts.

vs alternatives

Implied to be superior to standard water or untreated electrolyte mixes, especially for palatability and rapid absorption in high-volume training scenarios.

If Element had a use case that was the best use case possible, a full day of training for CrossFit athletes would have to be up there.

Also said
“They re-engineered it and now you can buy the Element can, which is even more optimally hydrating than before and tastier, I might add.”— Highlights the specific reformulation claim that adds value.
“They train in the heat, they sweat a ton, they need sweat to be replenished ASAP cuz they train all day long. Element is absolutely solution.”— Directly ties the product’s benefit to the training demands observed in the video.
Find Element

RP Hypertrophy App

Product Sponsored · disclosed

Mentioned as the recommended tool for anyone who wants to train specifically to build muscle like a physique athlete rather than chase CrossFit performance.

DisclosureDr. Mike is the co-founder of RP Strength, which makes the RP Hypertrophy App; this is a direct promotion of his own product.

While watching Tia’s dumbbell bench press, Dr. Mike contrasts sport-performance technique with hypertrophy training. He notes that if someone wants to look like a CrossFitter solely for aesthetics, they’d get better results from dedicated bodybuilding-style lifting because CrossFit’s additional endurance work can attenuate muscle gains. He then directs the viewer to the RP Hypertrophy App as the go-to programming resource for that pure hypertrophy goal. The recommendation is brief and tightly linked to the visual example of Tia’s power-focused, non-hypertrophy bench press.

vs alternatives

Compared implicitly to CrossFit programming for physique outcomes: RP Hypertrophy App (bodybuilding focus) will build more muscle than CrossFit because it avoids the catabolic interference of extreme endurance volume.

If you wanted to lifting just to look like a CrossFitter, the RP-Hypertrophy app is something you look no further and just do that.

Find RP

Notable quotes

Lines worth pulling out — contrarian, specific, or perfectly phrased

6 items
She's not just the best female CrossFit her of all time. She's the best CrossFit her of all time because no one on the male side has won any more than five.
A bold, definitive GOAT claim that subverts the typical gender-separated athlete hierarchy.
You may never be training the skills as a real advanced athlete with enough succession in time, like weeks and weeks and weeks on end to get much better at them. You're just trying to make sure you don't get worse.
Encapsulates a counterintuitive, high-level training philosophy that mastery is sometimes about arresting decay.
You can go lower intensity better after high intensity than the other way around for adaptations.
A concise, physiologically grounded training principle that justifies typical off-season sequencing.
If you train strength work always before your metabolic conditioning work, if you are asked to do strength work after metcons in the same event, you are going to be out of your mind. Your hips feel weird, your legs feel weird, your technique feels off.
Vividly explains why specificity of fatigue state is critical for competition readiness, using visceral language.
CrossFitters do so much volume, being jacked is a side effect.
A pithy, memorable observation about how the sport’s volume produces aesthetics without bodybuilding intent.
She's not doing this to get the best chest muscle workout, she's doing this to have the best strength and work capacity in her pushing muscles, which will transfer to other events.
Perfectly distinguishes between training for sport performance and training for muscle isolation, illuminating the sport-first mindset.

Sign in to share feedback

Tell us if this brief hit the mark or missed it — feedback feeds back into the next iteration of the prompt.

Topics covered

crossfit-gamestia-clair-toomeyweightlifting-backgroundskill-maintenancetraining-periodizationtraining-under-fatigueresting-heart-rateaerobic-fitnesshydrationelectrolyte-supplementrecovery-monitoringhypertrophy-vs-performanceoverreachingsleep-and-recovery
Free account

Make this library yours

Reading is free for everyone. A free account adds the personal layer: save protocols, follow experts, and see how the other experts weigh in on this same topic.

Create a free accountSign in

Where the experts disagree — weekly

One email a week: the sharpest new disagreements and protocols from the library. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Educational summary of the cited expert source — not medical advice. Open the source recording linked above and consult a qualified physician before acting on any protocol.