UNFUCG
DashboardSearchChatBookmarksNotificationsActivityPremiumProfile
?
Home
Search
Chat
Saved
Profile
Episode
Exercise Scientist Critiques Ronnie Coleman’s SHOCKING DIET!
~26 min
Episode Brief·YouTube

Exercise Scientist Critiques Ronnie Coleman’s SHOCKING DIET!

Mike Israetel
Watch on YouTube Add to chat My bookmarks← All sources

TL;DR

The four things you'd lose by not watching

4 items

TL;DR

The four things you'd lose by not watching

4 items
1

Stick to a precisely structured diet plan to free up cognitive bandwidth and ensure you're not second-guessing your nutrition, especially during contest prep.

2

Protein intake up to 1.5 g per pound of body weight per day may offer a small edge for muscle growth or retention, but going higher (like Ronnie's 600 g) is overkill and makes it hard to fit in enough fats and carbs.

3

When bulking, aim for a slow gain of 0.5 lb per week, make your food tastier with seasonings and cooking methods, and drink non-nutritive sweetened beverages with meals to help get the calories down without excess fat gain.

4

Patience is critical: realistic muscle gain is 5–10 lb per year, achieved by cycling short bulks and cuts rather than trying to balloon up quickly, which mostly just adds fat.

Protocols

Concrete recipes — what, when, how much, and why

8 items

Stick to a structured diet plan

WhatFollow a pre-planned diet with exact meals and timing, without deviation.
WhenDuring contest preparation or any phase where optimal physique is the goal.
DoseDaily adherence until goal is achieved.
For whomAnyone aiming for their best physique, especially competitive bodybuilders.
WhyEnsures mechanistic benefits of the diet and provides psychological advantages of reduced cognitive load and increased confidence.
CaveatsRequires upfront planning; may be less necessary for casual lifters.

Mike argues that a structured diet offers two main benefits. Mechanistically, if the diet is well-designed, you get all its intended effects. Psychologically, it saves cognitive bandwidth because you don't have to make food decisions on the fly, which is especially valuable during the mental fatigue of prep. It also provides confidence: you know you're doing everything right, eliminating the doubt of whether a better diet could have yielded better results. He contrasts this with 'yolo' dieting, where inconsistency leads to second-guessing and suboptimal outcomes.

Mechanism

Cognitive bandwidth preservation: pre-made decisions reduce mental fatigue. Confidence/assuredness: removes uncertainty about dietary compliance, which can lower stress and improve adherence.

If you are a machine like Ronnie Coleman and you eat the diet you're supposed to be eating, your cognitive bandwidth is freed up and you can rest assured that you're doing your very best and on mechanisms, you probably are.

Also said
“One of the psychological reasons is when you have a structured diet, you just save yourself a lot of cognitive bandwidth cuz you already know in advance what you're going to be eating and you just do the plan.”— Explains the cognitive benefit.
“The other psychological benefit is one of kind of assuredness, of confidence. You have a diet that's well planned, you're executing it. All you have to do is do it and you don't have to worry about am I doing the diet right?”— Highlights the confidence aspect.

Weigh and measure food when precision is needed

WhatWeigh foods that lack clear portion labels, especially as you get leaner or closer to a competition.
WhenDuring fat loss phases, particularly in the final weeks before a show or photoshoot.
DoseAs needed per meal.
For whomDieters aiming for very low body fat percentages.
WhyEnsures accurate macro tracking when visual estimation is unreliable, preventing accidental over- or under-eating.
CaveatsNot necessary for all foods; many packaged items have accurate labels. Over-weighing can become obsessive.

Mike notes that modern food labeling often makes weighing unnecessary—if a package states the macros per piece, you can just count pieces. However, for foods without clear per-unit labeling (like bulk rice or meat), weighing becomes important. The need for precision increases as you get leaner because small errors can stall progress. He recommends using an app like RP Diet Coach to log macros, which simplifies the process.

Does the importance of weighing your food increase as you get closer and closer to the end of your diet where you want to be your leanest, be that ending in a show or not? Absolutely yes.

Also said
“You do have to measure everything in the sense you got to write down your macros in your RPE diet coach app, but you might not have to weigh everything.”— Clarifies the distinction between measuring (tracking) and weighing.

Protein intake up to 1.5 g per pound of body weight

WhatConsume up to 1.5 grams of protein per pound of body weight daily during muscle-building or fat-loss phases.
WhenDaily, especially during bulking or contest prep.
DoseUp to 1.5 g/lb/day; for a 220 lb person, ~330 g.
For whomAdvanced bodybuilders and those seeking every possible edge.
WhyMay provide a small additional benefit for muscle growth or retention beyond 1 g/lb, based on theoretical and some empirical evidence.
CaveatsGoing higher risks displacing fats and carbs needed for hormonal health and performance. Not necessary for most people; 1 g/lb is sufficient for many.

Mike discusses Ronnie Coleman's 600 g protein intake in the context of his ~300 lb body weight. He notes that 1.5 g/lb would be 450 g, and 600 g is only slightly above that, so it's not as outrageous as it sounds. However, he cautions against exceeding 1.5 g/lb because it leaves less room for hormonally enhancing fats and glycogen-filling carbs. He personally eats just over 300 g at 220 lb, which fits the upper limit. The difference between 1 g and 1.5 g is small, but for someone like Ronnie, it might have been worth it.

Mechanism

Higher protein intake may slightly elevate muscle protein synthesis and reduce muscle protein breakdown, aiding in net muscle accretion or preservation during energy deficit.

Personal experience

Mike currently eats just over 300 g of protein daily at 220 lb, finding it effective without being excessive.

I'd say the highest you should probably go is about a gram and a half per pound of body weight per day.

Also said
“We know now that up to about a gram and a half of protein per pound of body weight per day has some theoretical basis as probably growing a little bit more muscle potentially or saving more muscle in a prep than even a gram per pound.”— Provides the scientific justification.
“The big reason is you want to make room for plenty of hormonally enhancing fats and insulin driving and glycogen filling and workout powering carbs.”— Explains the downside of excessive protein.

Gain half a pound per week when bulking

WhatAim for a weight gain rate of 0.5 lb per week during bulking phases to minimize fat gain.
WhenDuring intentional muscle-building phases (off-season).
Dose0.5 lb/week for 12–20 weeks, then maintain for 1–2 months, then cut.
For whomAnyone looking to add muscle without excessive fat, especially natural lifters.
WhySlower gain partitions more calories toward muscle and less toward fat, reducing the need for aggressive cutting later.
CaveatsRequires patience; scale weight may fluctuate daily, so trends over weeks matter.

Mike shares that he repeatedly tried to gain weight quickly by eating huge amounts of clean food, but it only made him fat. He now advocates a moderate surplus of about half a pound per week. This approach, combined with cycling bulks and cuts, yields 5–10 lb of muscle per year—a significant amount. He emphasizes that the 'long haul' works, while rapid bulking leads to disappointment and unnecessary fat gain.

Mechanism

A smaller caloric surplus limits the rate of adipose tissue accumulation while still supporting muscle protein synthesis, as the body's capacity for muscle growth per unit time is limited.

Personal experience

Mike says he tried to balloon up quickly about 10 times and always ended up 'grotesquely fat,' calling it one of the dumbest things he's done.

Stop trying to gain a pound a week and gain half a pound a week instead. You can cut your surplus calories by half, you'll make amazing gains, you'll get less fat.

Also said
“Some of the dumbest shit I've ever done in my life was eat way too much clean food and get fat off of clean food.”— Personal anecdote underscoring the mistake.
“If you can gain for 16 or 12 to 20 weeks at a time, gain half a pound, take a little break, maintain for a month or two at that weight, and then take one to two months to lose about a pound per week, repeating that cycle over and over is probably what's going to get you to your biggest.”— Outlines the full cyclical strategy.

Make food tastier to eat more during bulking

WhatUse seasonings, grilling, air frying, and other flavor-enhancing methods to increase food palatability when trying to consume a high-calorie diet.
WhenDuring bulking or any phase where appetite is a limiting factor.
DoseApply to meals as desired; avoid during contest prep when bland food helps control hunger.
For whomIndividuals struggling to eat enough clean food to gain weight.
WhyThe food palatability reward hypothesis states that tastier food increases the desire to eat and the amount consumed, making it easier to hit calorie targets.
CaveatsDuring fat loss phases, bland food is preferable to avoid overeating. Spices and seasonings are generally calorie-free and safe.

Mike explains that many bodybuilders suffer through plain chicken and rice, but making food enjoyable can turn force-feeding into a pleasant experience. He cites the food palatability reward hypothesis: the tastier the food, the more you want to eat and the more you can eat. This is beneficial when bulking, but the opposite is true when dieting—bland food helps keep hunger in check. He recommends grilling, air frying, and using spices liberally in the off-season.

Mechanism

Palatability increases dopamine-mediated reward, stimulating appetite and reducing the sensation of fullness, allowing higher caloric intake.

The food palatability reward hypothesis is the idea that says the tastier your food is, the more of it you can eat, and the more of it you want to eat.

Also said
“Instead of eating like plain white rice and boiled chicken breast and hating it, you can eat seasoned rice and grilled chicken, which is also seasoned, and be having the time of your life and be hungry for every meal because you love what you're eating so much.”— Practical application of the hypothesis.

Drink non-nutritive sweetened beverages with meals

WhatConsume diet sodas, Crystal Light, Mio, or similar zero-calorie sweet drinks alongside meals to help food go down easier.
WhenDuring bulking when struggling to finish large meals.
DoseAs desired with meals.
For whomThose who have trouble eating enough calories from whole foods.
WhyThe sweet, tangy flavor seems to facilitate swallowing and reduce the monotony of dense foods like chicken and rice.
CaveatsThese drinks are neutral for health; avoid if they cause bloating or digestive issues.

Mike shares a personal tip that has helped him tremendously: drinking non-nutritive sweetened beverages with meals. He finds that something like diet orange soda or Crystal Light makes chicken and rice go down much more easily than plain water. He reassures viewers that these products are safe and neutral for health. This strategy aligns with the broader principle of making the bulking process more enjoyable to improve adherence and performance.

Mechanism

The sweet taste may trigger cephalic phase responses that prepare the digestive system, and the flavor contrast can reduce sensory-specific satiety, allowing continued eating.

Personal experience

Mike says this tip has 'helped me a ton' and that chicken and rice goes down much easier with a sweet drink.

For some reason, chicken and rice goes down much easier when you have like diet orange soda or Crystal Light or the Mio drink helpers and like just without plain water.

Also said
“By the way, these things are totally fine for your health. They're neutral for your health.”— Addresses common health concerns about artificial sweeteners.

Eat vegetables at most meals during fat loss

WhatInclude a serving of vegetables with nearly every meal, especially when dieting to get lean.
WhenDuring fat loss phases, and ideally year-round for health.
DoseAt almost every meal.
For whomAlmost everyone, particularly those in a calorie deficit.
WhyVegetables provide fiber for satiety, essential vitamins and minerals, and phytochemicals that support overall health and diet adherence.
CaveatsSome people may need to limit very high-fiber veggies if they cause digestive distress; otherwise, widely beneficial.

Mike strongly advocates for vegetable consumption, noting that Ronnie Coleman skipped them simply because he didn't like the taste, yet his blood work was fine. However, Mike stresses that vegetables are incredibly healthy, offering fiber that slows digestion and keeps you full, which is critical when calories are low. They also provide a wide array of micronutrients and phytochemicals with cumulative health effects. He encourages viewers to learn from Ronnie's dedication but not to copy his vegetable avoidance.

Mechanism

Fiber increases gastric distension and slows gastric emptying, promoting satiety. Vitamins and minerals act as cofactors in metabolic processes; phytochemicals have antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects.

For almost everyone eating a bunch of veggies when you're fat loss dieting at almost every meal is a really, really, really great idea.

Also said
“Vegetables include fiber, which is amazing for your health. Fiber also slows the digestion rate of food down, gets you full so that on a fat loss diet you're not as hungry.”— Explains the satiety mechanism.
“Vegetables have a crap load of vitamins, crap load of minerals, and a crap load of phytochemicals, which are specific plant chemicals that have usually a ton of lead tiny health effects that do absolutely add up.”— Details the micronutrient and phytochemical benefits.

Carb cycling with low days and refeeds

WhatAlternate multiple days of low carbohydrate intake with one or more high-carb refeed days, repeating throughout contest prep.
WhenDuring the final weeks leading up to a bodybuilding competition.
DoseLow days until fatigue and water retention accumulate, then 1–2 high-carb days; cycle repeats.
For whomCompetitive bodybuilders during prep.
WhyLow days promote fat loss; refeeds replenish muscle glycogen, reduce fatigue, and allow practice of peak-week carb loading.
CaveatsRequires careful monitoring of appearance and performance; individual response varies.

Mike explains that Ronnie Coleman's coach used a pulsatile approach: several low-carb days to drive fat loss, followed by a high-carb day to refill glycogen, dissipate accumulated water, and recharge the body. This pattern also serves as a dress rehearsal for peak week, helping the athlete learn how many carbs, sodium, and fluids produce the best look. Mike notes that this low-low-low-high pattern is nearly universal in bodybuilding coaching because it's grounded in real physiology and works effectively.

Mechanism

Low carbohydrate intake reduces insulin and glycogen, shifting the body toward fat oxidation. Prolonged low carbs can elevate cortisol and cause water retention; a refeed raises insulin, promotes glycogen storage, and lowers cortisol, improving muscle fullness and reducing subcutaneous water.

That pulsatile low low low low high low low low high that approach is almost universal in bodybuilding coaching because it's based on real physiology and it actually works.

Also said
“Over the course of multiple days of low carbohydrate and thus low calorie dieting, Ronnie's losing a bunch of fat, but he's accumulating body water from the stress and accumulating fatigue.”— Describes the rationale for needing a refeed.
“The coaches will reintroduce high carbohydrates for sometimes a day, sometimes a few days, higher calories that will refill the muscle glycogen stores, replicate what happens close to the peak of the show so that you can learn how many carbs really hit the spot well.”— Explains the practical purpose of the refeed.

What's new

Personal practice updates, fresh positions, predictions

3 items

Personal protein intake

Mike Israetel currently eats just over 300 g of protein daily at a body weight of 220 lb, aligning with the 1.5 g/lb upper limit he recommends.

Why this matters: It provides a real-world example of the protein guideline applied by an expert, showing that even a large, advanced lifter doesn't need 600 g.

Background

Bodybuilding lore often glorifies extreme protein intakes, with Ronnie Coleman's 600 g/day being legendary. Modern research suggests diminishing returns beyond 1.5 g/lb.

Mike explains that while up to 1.5 g/lb may offer a slight benefit over 1 g/lb for muscle growth or retention, the difference is small. For a 300 lb Ronnie, 450–500 g is defensible, and 600 g is only a bit beyond that. However, Mike emphasizes that such high intakes are unnecessary for almost everyone and can crowd out hormonally important fats and performance-fueling carbs. He uses his own intake—300 g at 220 lb—to illustrate that even a dedicated lifter can thrive at the upper end of the evidence-based range without going to extremes.

Personal experience

Mike shares that he currently eats just over 300 g of protein daily at 220 lb, which he finds effective and manageable.

I'm currently eating about just over 300 g of protein daily and I weigh about 220 lb. So, that makes sense. But, 600, boy, that's a lot.

Also said
“We know now that up to about a gram and a half of protein per pound of body weight per day has some theoretical basis as probably growing a little bit more muscle potentially or saving more muscle in a prep than even a gram per pound.”— Provides the scientific rationale for the upper limit.
“The big reason is you want to make room for plenty of hormonally enhancing fats and insulin driving and glycogen filling and workout powering carbs.”— Explains the trade-off of excessive protein.

Bulking mistakes and slow gain

Mike admits that trying to gain weight too fast by overeating clean food was one of the dumbest things he's done, as it only led to excessive fat gain.

Why this matters: It counters the 'eat big to get big' mentality and advocates for a patient, moderate surplus approach based on personal failure.

Background

Many lifters believe that force-feeding themselves clean food is a hardcore path to muscle, but Mike argues it's counterproductive.

Mike recounts multiple attempts to balloon up quickly, which always resulted in becoming 'grotesquely fat' rather than significantly more muscular. He now advocates for gaining half a pound per week over 12–20 week bulks, followed by a maintenance phase and a slow cut. This cycling approach, repeated over years, yields about 5–10 lb of actual muscle annually—a substantial amount in the real world. He stresses that patience and consistency outperform aggressive bulking, which mostly adds fat and extends suffering.

Personal experience

Mike says he tried to rapidly gain weight about 10 times in his life and each time ended up just getting fat, calling it 'really really really stupid.'

Some of the dumbest shit I've ever done in my life was eat way too much clean food and get fat off of clean food.

Also said
“I've tried to balloon up to massive body weights quickly, like 10 times in my life. Mostly what I got was just being grotesquely fat.”— Reinforces the personal failure with rapid bulking.
“If you can gain for 16 or 12 to 20 weeks at a time, gain half a pound, take a little break, maintain for a month or two at that weight, and then take one to two months to lose about a pound per week, repeating that cycle over and over is probably what's going to get you to your biggest.”— Details the specific long-term strategy.

Vegetable avoidance vs. health

Despite Ronnie Coleman skipping vegetables and having good blood work, Mike strongly recommends eating vegetables for their fiber, vitamins, minerals, and phytochemicals, especially during fat loss.

Why this matters: It addresses the common bodybuilder habit of neglecting vegetables and provides a science-backed counterargument, while acknowledging individual variation.

Background

Ronnie Coleman famously avoided vegetables because he disliked the taste, yet his blood work remained perfect. This might lead some to question the necessity of veggies.

Mike explains that vegetables offer numerous health benefits, including fiber that slows digestion and increases satiety—crucial during a calorie deficit. They also provide a wide array of vitamins, minerals, and phytochemicals with cumulative positive health effects. While Ronnie got away with it, Mike advises that for almost everyone, eating vegetables at most meals during fat loss is a 'really, really, really great idea.' He humorously notes that Ronnie's hardcore dedication didn't extend to overcoming a dislike for veggies, and encourages viewers to eat them regardless.

Eating vegetables is incredibly amazing for your health in about a hundred ways that they've measured and probably hundreds they have yet to measure.

Also said
“Vegetables have a crap load of vitamins, crap load of minerals, and a crap load of phytochemicals, which are specific plant chemicals that have usually a ton of lead tiny health effects that do absolutely add up.”— Details the specific beneficial compounds in vegetables.
“For almost everyone eating a bunch of veggies when you're fat loss dieting at almost every meal is a really, really, really great idea.”— Direct recommendation for vegetable consumption during dieting.

Recommendations

Products, supplements, and tools mentioned in the episode

1 item

Use non-nutritive sweetened drinks to aid bulking

Practice

Recommended as a practical tip to help consume large meals during bulking by pairing food with diet soda, Crystal Light, or similar drinks.

Mike shares that drinking something sweet and tangy with meals makes dense foods like chicken and rice go down much easier. He emphasizes that these drinks are health-neutral and can make the bulking process more enjoyable, reducing the suffering often associated with force-feeding.

vs alternatives

Compared to plain water, which doesn't provide the same flavor contrast or swallowing ease.

Personal experience

Mike says this tip has 'helped me a ton' personally.

Tip number two for bulking has helped me a ton, and it is consuming non-nutritive sweetener drinks with my food.

Also said
“By the way, these things are totally fine for your health. They're neutral for your health.”— Addresses safety concerns.
Find Use
Disclosed sponsorships3speaker disclosed

RP Diet Coach app

Product Sponsored · disclosed

Mentioned as a tool to easily follow a structured diet plan by logging macros and sticking to the plan.

DisclosureMike Israetel is a co-founder of RP Strength and promotes the app in the video.

Mike plugs the RP Diet Coach app when discussing the importance of eating exactly what is on your diet. He notes that the app simplifies tracking and ensures you don't leave anything to chance, which is critical for physique goals.

If you have the RP Diet Coach app, you can do that really easy. Yeah, break the plug. And then you're not leaving anything to chance.

Find RP

Hyper Belt

Product Sponsored · disclosed

Recommended as a comfortable, hypertrophy-focused lifting belt that offers precise fit adjustments, unlike traditional belts with widely spaced holes.

DisclosureMike promotes the Hyper Belt, designed by Jared Feather and sold by the same company as Versa Gripps, with a direct call to purchase via the link in the description.

Mike jokes that if Ronnie Coleman had used the Hyper Belt, he might have won even more, but then seriously endorses it for heavy leg training. He highlights its design for hypertrophy, comfortable fit, and the ability to get a perfect adjustment. He uses it personally for all his heavy leg work.

vs alternatives

Compared to a traditional belt with holes an inch apart that digs into the sides, the Hyper Belt offers infinite adjustability and better comfort.

Personal experience

Mike says, 'I use it all the time for my heavy leg training. I love it.'

The hyper belt is dope. I use it all the time for my heavy leg training. I love it. It's designed for hypertrophy. It fits comfortably. It's awesome.

Also said
“If Ronnie Coleman had the hyper belt by the same fine folks that brought you Versa Gripps designed by Jared Feather Ice Pro and I personally then Ronnie Coleman could have won eight and a half Mr. Olympias.”— Humorous endorsement highlighting the belt's supposed superiority.
Find Hyper

RP Hypertrophy app

Product Sponsored · disclosed

Presented as a training app that removes uncertainty by providing pre-made workout plans and auto-regulating weights for months of productive training.

DisclosureMike Israetel is a co-founder of RP Strength and promotes the app.

Mike describes the RP Hypertrophy app as a tool that precisely defines the training process. Users choose from dozens of plans, input their weights, and the app manages progression. He encourages viewers to click the link in the description to get started.

The RP Hypertrophy app removes all uncertainty and makes the training process precisely defined.

Find RP

Notable quotes

Lines worth pulling out — contrarian, specific, or perfectly phrased

5 items
Some of the dumbest shit I've ever done in my life was eat way too much clean food and get fat off of clean food.
A candid, self-deprecating admission that challenges the 'clean bulk at all costs' mentality.
If you yolo the diet, you have some good days, you have some bad days. As the show comes up or as your best physique is sort of maybe taking shape, you have to wonder would this have been better if I had have eaten a better diet?
Captures the psychological downside of an unstructured approach—lingering doubt about what could have been.
The food palatability reward hypothesis is the idea that says the tastier your food is, the more of it you can eat, and the more of it you want to eat.
A concise, memorable definition of a key concept for bulking strategy.
Patience is huge in this game. I've tried to balloon up to massive body weights quickly, like 10 times in my life. Mostly what I got was just being grotesquely fat.
Brutally honest reflection on the failure of rapid weight gain, reinforcing the value of slow progress.
That pulsatile low low low low high low low low high that approach is almost universal in bodybuilding coaching because it's based on real physiology and it actually works.
A rhythmic, emphatic endorsement of carb cycling that sticks in the mind.

Sign in to share feedback

Tell us if this brief hit the mark or missed it — feedback feeds back into the next iteration of the prompt.

Topics covered

structured-dietprotein-intakebulking-strategiesvegetable-consumptionmuscle-gain-ratecarb-cyclingmeal-frequencyfood-weighingnon-nutritive-sweetenershyper-beltrp-diet-coach-apprp-hypertrophy-appfood-palatabilitycontest-prepronnie-coleman
Free account

Make this library yours

Reading is free for everyone. A free account adds the personal layer: save protocols, follow experts, and see how the other experts weigh in on this same topic.

Create a free accountSign in

Where the experts disagree — weekly

One email a week: the sharpest new disagreements and protocols from the library. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Educational summary of the cited expert source — not medical advice. Open the source recording linked above and consult a qualified physician before acting on any protocol.