UNFUCG
DashboardSearchChatBookmarksNotificationsActivityPremiumProfile
?
Home
Search
Chat
Saved
Profile
Episode
354 – What the dying can teach us about living well: lessons on life and reflections on mortality
~182 min
Episode Brief·YouTube

354 – What the dying can teach us about living well: lessons on life and reflections on mortality

Peter Attia
Watch on YouTube Add to chat My bookmarks← All sources

TL;DR

The four things you'd lose by not watching

4 items

TL;DR

The four things you'd lose by not watching

4 items
1

Palliative care is distinct from hospice—it's holistic support for serious illness at any stage, not just end-of-life, yet most people confuse the two and miss months of potential relief. The average hospice enrollment is only 3 weeks because both patients and physicians avoid the conversation.

2

An advanced directive is a free, no-lawyer-needed form; its most essential element is naming a healthcare proxy, followed by a honest dinner-table conversation about what makes life meaningful, not just what treatments to refuse.

3

At the very end, the body shuts down across organ systems—fatigue, loss of appetite, delirium—and the dying person often needs privacy to let go. Delirium doesn't always need medication; it can be meaningful. Physical pain can be managed with opioids, but existential suffering requires connection and honesty.

4

The most consistent insight from the dying is that people regret not allowing themselves to truly feel or being authentic; they wish they had removed the wedges between themselves and others. This fuels the advice to start living the death you want by getting real with yourself now.

Protocols

Concrete recipes — what, when, how much, and why

6 items

Complete an advance directive, choose a proxy, and have a dinner conversation

WhatDownload a free advance directive form online, name a healthcare proxy, and then hold a relaxed, in-depth conversation over dinner to discuss what makes life meaningful, not just what interventions to refuse.
WhenAs soon as one is 18; revisit periodically and after major health changes.
DoseA single form plus an ongoing conversation (multiple sessions over time).
For whomEveryone 18 and older, especially before any serious illness.
WhyThe proxy and their clear understanding of your values prevent unwanted treatment and reduce family conflict when you cannot speak. The conversation focuses on positive goals ('what gets you out of bed') rather than solely on DNR/DNI.
CaveatsPeople's preferences can change as they live with disability or illness; the conversation must be revisited. The form alone is insufficient; a proxy signing without discussion is a disservice.

Bridget emphasizes that while most people say they want an advance directive, few actually do it. The most critical element is the proxy, not the checkbox list of procedures. She encourages imagining the scene: if you're incapacitated, who do you want making decisions? She suggests framing the conversation around what experiences are essential for quality of life—'I want to be in my garden, hear my family's voices'—so the proxy knows how to advocate for a scenario that allows those, rather than just saying no to intubation. BJ adds that the proxy's job is to speak for you, not impose their will; that requires deep knowledge of your values. Peter Attia shares that when asked to be a proxy, he insists on a dinner with wine and an open discussion because he wants to truly understand the person's desires.

Mechanism

Legally, the directive grants authority to the proxy. Psychologically, aligning your wishes with someone you trust reduces the burden on families and ensures care matches your values.

Personal experience

Peter Attia: 'I say the same thing to all of them, which is it's an honor to do it, but we have to sit and talk. Like it's not you can't hand me that stick and just sign my name on there cuz I like we're going to have dinner. We're going to have a bottle of wine. We are going to talk this through.'

One sort of public service announcement here is advanced directives is very important and you can download a form online like this is a free but you don't need a lawyer to do this. No, you do not need a lawyer to do this.

Also said
“If you had to pick sort of one of the questions that gets asked, it's probably the proxy.”— Highlights the proxy's primacy.
“I'm more interested in when I have been asked to be in that role to understand you know what what makes this person's life not cuz it's going to perfectly translate... okay but what if you could like see the full moon from your bed like is that you know like we we that's a really important point.”— Shows the shift from DNR language to goals-of-care language.

Manage symptoms first to open space for existential suffering

WhatWith serious illness, first turn down the volume of physical symptoms (pain, nausea, breathlessness) using appropriate medications, then address the psychological, existential, and relational suffering.
WhenUpon entering palliative or hospice care, and ongoing as needed.
DoseContinuous monitoring; adjust medications to allow alertness for meaningful work but with comfort.
For whomAnyone facing terminal or serious illness under palliative care.
WhyPhysical distress drowns out a person's ability to process fear, regret, or relational healing. Once pain is controlled, the real therapeutic work of addressing suffering can begin.
CaveatsMay require palliative sedation if pain or dyspnea is refractory, but this is a last resort. Some patients decline opioids for cultural or personal reasons; their choice must be respected.

BJ explains that a common misconception is that palliative care is just symptom management, but that's only the start. He says, 'in some ways the first thing to do is turn down the symptoms the degree possible so that the rest of you is present.' Once the nausea or pain is managed, the patient can talk about their fears, unfinished business, or spiritual crisis. Bridget adds that when symptoms are loud, 'you're not going to tell me how you're feeling other than the nausea.' The work then shifts to relationship building, advanced care planning, and existential work. The speakers also note that suffering is different from pain; someone can have minimal pain but massive suffering, and vice versa. The art is to titrate comfort enough to enable the deeper conversation.

Mechanism

Opioids reduce pain signaling and also alleviate air hunger (dyspnea). This reduces the stress response, allowing higher brain functions (emotional processing, connection) to operate without constant alarm.

Personal experience

BJ: 'If we want to help people use the medicines correctly to get to that place where they might be as comfortable as we're able to get them, like we got to peel back the layers on the relationship to the medicines being used.'

When symptoms are loud, it is really hard to get into the places of suffering that are about incompleteness.

Also said
“Pain is a sort of a stimulus... suffering has um is a mosaic of physical, emotional, spiritual, existential... someone may have inordinate pain, but if they believe that that pain is redemptive, it's going to bring them closer to God or is burning off some bad karma, they're not suffering.”— Clarifies the pain/suffering distinction central to this protocol.

Support the dying person's need for solitude

WhatWhen someone is actively dying, encourage family members to take breaks, go to the bathroom, eat, and not exhaust themselves in vigil. The dying person may need privacy to let go.
WhenDuring the final days to hours of life.
DoseRegular breaks; no one should forgo self-care for more than a few hours.
For whomFamily and friends keeping a deathbed vigil.
WhyMany dying individuals appear to wait until they are alone to pass. Exhausting yourself in a vigil can inadvertently tether them and worsen everyone's experience.
CaveatsThis doesn't mean abandoning the person; it means ensuring that everyone's basic needs are met and that the environment allows the dying person to let go naturally. It is not a guarantee, but a well-observed pattern.

Bridget tells families that the dying process is a lived experience for everyone in the room. She sees people refuse to leave for seconds, even to use the bathroom, fearing they'll miss the final breath. She and BJ both affirm that many patients seem to need solitude to die. BJ says it may be 'exactly the thing that person needs.' They advise normalizing this: it's okay if death occurs in your absence; it doesn't mean you failed. The point is to care for the living as well, and not to impose a medicalized, hyper-vigilant death.

Personal experience

Bridget: 'I've counseled a lot of people... people won't get up and go to the bathroom because they don't want to miss that moment. They won't eat, they don't eat... it is a time to be thinking about really basic needs and basic comforts for everyone in the space.'

Go to the bathroom, take a walk, kiss the person goodbye, drink some water, and know that not only they may they may be gone when you come back, but that may be exactly what they needed to finally let go.

Also said
“I just I I don't think any of us could tell you why this is, but it is just a thing. You talk to anyone who worked in hospice for a while, it seems to be that a lot of people need to be alone for the final their final moments on the planet to really let go.”— Emphasizes the universality of the observation.

Use opioids judiciously at end of life, addressing fears and myths

WhatOpioids are key for managing pain and shortness of breath at end of life, but they must be introduced with a sensitive conversation about addiction, sobriety, and myths (e.g., 'hanging the morphine'). No one needs to suffer physically; palliative sedation is available if needed.
WhenWhen symptoms of pain or dyspnea are not controlled by non-opioid means, always in a conversation about goals and fears.
DoseTitrated to symptom relief; may require higher doses that cause sedation. Not time-limited; adjust as needed.
For whomPatients with cancer, COPD, heart failure, or any terminal illness with distressing physical symptoms.
WhyOpioids are the most effective class for severe pain and air hunger. Misconceptions lead to undertreatment and unnecessary suffering. The goal is comfort, not hastening death.
CaveatsIn the context of addiction history or sobriety, explore the meaning of relapse; respect the patient's choice. The medication is not addictive in the dying context because of medical supervision and short horizon. Palliative sedation is a last resort when other measures fail.

The speakers address the cultural baggage around opioids. People worry about addiction, or that getting 'the morphine' means euthanasia. BJ clarifies that no one is 'killed' with morphine; it's titrated to comfort, and doses are not aimed at ending life. He often proactively explains, 'you're not going to get addicted to these medicines.' For those in recovery, he explores what sobriety means to them and reassures them that using prescribed opioids for comfort does not break their sobriety if they consent. He emphasizes that they can change their mind later. Bridget adds that some people believe pain is redemptive or refuse all medications; their wishes are honored, though they may suffer more.

Mechanism

Opioids bind to mu receptors in the central nervous system, reducing pain perception and the sensation of breathlessness. They do not primarily cause respiratory depression at therapeutic doses for dyspnea, contrary to myth.

Personal experience

BJ: 'I might say there is no from where I sit Peter there's no nobility and you suffering unnecessarily or being pained unnecessarily you as a sober person allowing me to prescribe you an opiate at this stage your life to me personally as your physician poses no moral quandry to me at all but what about you know you're a person who's living in these shoes.'

No one in 2025 needs to suffer during death. As long as you include the potential for sedation to be part of that, it may take so much narcotic to quell your pain or your shortness of breath. Yes. That we are actively putting you to sleep.

Also said
“A lot of people when they hear get the morphine, it's a there's a phrase like hang the morphine sometimes is a euphemism for essentially euthanizing a patient. And I it's not legal to do that anywhere. We're not going to kill you. You know, we're going to use only as much medicine as this helps your symptoms.”— Directly counters the myth that morphine is used to end life.

Begin practicing the death you want today by living honestly and connected

WhatCultivate honest self-awareness, embrace fear and regret as natural, practice connection with self and others, and develop the muscle of sitting with uncertainty and things you cannot control.
WhenNow, while healthy; a continuous, lifelong practice.
DoseDaily or regular introspection, meditation, journaling, or therapy. No set duration.
For whomAnyone, especially those who fear death or want to live more fully.
WhyPeople tend to die as they lived; if you want a death with presence, connection, and peace, you must train those capacities during life. The common regrets of the dying point to the cost of emotional avoidance and inauthenticity.
CaveatsThis is not about achieving a perfect 'good death'; it's about reducing unnecessary suffering by integrating mortality into daily life. Perfectionism about dying (fear of 'failing at dying') is itself harmful. The practice must include flexibility and self-compassion.

BJ says the work of preparing for dying begins earlier in life, not at the deathbed. He advocates for 'daring to look and to see and to be true to ourselves.' Bridget adds that we don't know when we'll die, so the invitation is to be tender now, to act from your values now, because this moment is all you have. She says we can all practice by noticing death and life around us. The speakers also caution that one can feel like a failure at dying; thus, the goal is not an idealized death but an honest, connected, and forgiving approach to whatever unfolds.

Mechanism

Psychological: repeated exposure to truth about mortality reduces its threatening power (similar to habituation in anxiety). Habits of connection and self-reflection build neural pathways that are accessible in times of high stress, including the dying process.

Personal experience

Bridget: 'I've got two young kids, so regular I'm kind of like, okay, this is my life. This is my life. Just as like a management strategy, but I think there's also like a a tether to the reality that like this moment is what I have, right? ... it is inarguable that we are always living in the reality that we don't know when we're going to die.' Peter Attia shares his own fear and acknowledges his strong desire to live, but he tries to learn to sit with that uncertainty.

If there's an experience you would like to happen, if you're imagining into the future, you're like, I think dying in this way would be okay or more tolerable or nice or beautiful, start doing it now. Like you want to forgive, like you're worried about forgiveness, like investigate that now, right?

Also said
“The work of preparing for dying begins earlier in life. ... A lot of the action is in the days, weeks, months, years preceding the death moment.”— Grounds the protocol in the episode's core thesis.
“Get real with yourself. The sooner the better.”— Concise maxim from BJ.

When supporting someone with a new diagnosis, start with rapport, not immediate planning

WhatIn palliative care, the initial visit(s) focus purely on building rapport, letting the patient express fear without being shushed, and understanding their experience—sometimes not even mentioning the diagnosis.
WhenUpon referral, before diving into symptom management or advanced care planning.
DoseOne to several sessions as needed.
For whomPalliative care clinicians and family members supporting a newly diagnosed individual.
WhyPatients need to feel seen and heard before they can engage with complex decisions. Trust enables them to share fears and eventually consider advance care planning. It is the foundation for all later work.
CaveatsMay seem like 'stalling' to an outsider, but it's essential. The patient sets the pace; some require many visits before tackling the diagnosis directly.

BJ emphasizes that the early work is 'so much of relational, getting to know the person, laying out a sort of a safe place for them to fall apart, share their fears without being shushed.' He says you might not ask about the diagnosis for several visits. By gathering knowledge about what matters to the person, the provider can later anticipate upcoming challenges and tailor conversations to that individual. Bridget adds that she often just asks, 'how has this been for you?' and listens without trying to fix or minimize. Many patients haven't had anyone simply ask that question; oncologists or neurologists are focused on treatment.

Mechanism

Psychological safety is necessary for brain to shift from threat mode to open processing. Without it, the patient cannot fully engage with existential questions.

Personal experience

BJ: 'As a provider, you are learning about what makes this person tick, what inspires them, what turns them off, what where their fears lie, etc. So you're gathering all this knowledge that that'll help you as you go down the road.'

The early work is so much of relational, getting to know the person, laying out a sort of a safe place for them to fall apart, share their fears without being shushed, all that stuff. So, Bridget's saying that I just really that's really key. And that might take all of the first visit. You may ask no questions about the diagnosis. It may take five visits before you get to anything that for the reason you're supposedly there.

Also said
“The number of times spouses, adult children just are immediately brought to tears with the question, how has this been for you? Because no one has asked them, not because they didn't want to, but usually because they don't have time.”— Demonstrates the power of simple relational questioning.

What's new

Personal practice updates, fresh positions, predictions

5 items

Palliative care is just good healthcare, not a transition to death

Palliative care is an interdisciplinary specialty focused on quality of life for anyone with serious illness, regardless of prognosis or whether they pursue curative treatment. It is distinct from hospice, but public confusion leads to underuse.

Why this matters: Many equate palliative care with giving up; the speakers stress that it can and should begin at diagnosis and run alongside aggressive treatment. This reframes it as proactive, holistic support rather than a surrender.

Background

Hospice, the older model, requires a six-month prognosis and cessation of curative care. Palliative care was born in the 1980s-90s when clinicians realized patients needed that support much earlier, without the hospice restrictions. Yet many physicians still don't refer because they believe they already provide it or think patients aren't ready.

BJ and Bridget argue that palliative care is fundamentally good healthcare—sitting down, introducing yourself, asking 'how has this been for you?' These elemental relational acts are often skipped in today's medicine. The team includes doctors, social workers, chaplains, and therapists. Its goal is quality of life as defined by the patient. Because of confusion between hospice and palliative care, people say 'I'm not ready for palliative care' when they really mean 'I'm not ready to stop fighting.' Once they understand, they often ask, 'Why wouldn't I want this?' Yet systemic barriers (staffing, billing, culture) keep referrals low. The speakers emphasize that palliative care is not easy; it requires a real skill set to time questions, listen for existential distress, and build trust over multiple visits.

Personal experience

BJ shares that in his clinic, he often hears patients and families say 'I'm not ready for palliative care,' and he clarifies the difference. Peter Attia reflects on his surgical residency, where heroics were celebrated until he realized they turned patients into physiology experiments.

Palliative care is just good healthcare. One of the crazies a rebranding, but yes. Yes, it really does.

Also said
“I'm wondering if I should be in palative care right now by the way the reality is paliative care is just good healthcare.”— Emphasizes that even people not actively dying can benefit.
“Pal of care is the larger umbrella. Hospice is the kind of the final months of life. Hospice is the older one.”— Historical context: hospice came first, palliative care later expanded access.

Delirium at end of life doesn't always need medication

BJ now challenges the reflex to medicate end-of-life delirium, arguing it may be meaningful expression rather than pure suffering, and suggests discussing preferences with the patient beforehand.

Why this matters: Conventional teaching is that delirium is inherently uncomfortable and warrants antipsychotics. BJ's evolution toward less aggressive medication, and his framing that delirium can contain vital experiences, contradicts standard practice.

Background

In hospital settings, delirium (hyperactive or hypoactive) is common and often medicated. At the end of life, hypoactive delirium is more typical—quiet, confused. Loved ones may misinterpret it as revealing deep secrets or final harsh words, causing lasting trauma.

BJ explains that as his career progressed and he integrated non-medical perspectives, he stopped automatically medicating delirium. He now sees it as potentially vital—maybe the person is expressing something important. He emphasizes that dying shouldn't be forced into a tidy, silent 'good death.' Instead, he'd have a conversation with the patient earlier: 'If you become confused, would you rather we medicate it and help you sleep, or let it run its course?' He underscores that death is messy, and the family's interpretation of final words should be held lightly, because delirium means the person is not themselves.

Personal experience

BJ shares, 'my own arc of my career and as I've sort of diluted the medical piece with other ways of thinking, I'm not so quick to shut that down.' He recounts families traumatized by a loved one's final words, which were likely delirium.

I increasingly would not medicate a delirium unless I had a conversation. ... It's much more mysterious than that.

Also said
“But one reason to bring it up um is because if you if you don't know what to look for, I think a lot of family members and and loved ones will be at that at the bed, you know, trying to ek out every last moment with this person and looking for clues about what's going on for them and last relational moments and exchanges. And very often I've heard from a lot of people reports of well gosh I my husband never said a mean word to me in our 50 years of marriage and I've been traumatized for the last two years since he died because those last words to me were this vulgar something or other.”— Illustrates the harm of taking delirious speech literally and the importance of educating families about delirium.
“There may be something either vital happening for that person in the bed to express whatever's in there.”— Supports the idea that delirium might serve a purpose and not just be suffering.

Advanced directive focus: proxy, not just DNR

The speakers urge everyone 18+ to complete an advance directive; the most critical part is naming a healthcare proxy and then having a relaxed, in-depth conversation over dinner about what gives life meaning, not just what treatments to avoid.

Why this matters: The shift from 'what don't you want?' to 'what makes life worth living?' is a more effective and compassionate way to guide end-of-life care, yet most people fixate on DNR/DNI.

Background

Studies show only about 20% of people have advance directives, despite most agreeing they're important. The traditional approach asks people to imagine future incapacitation, which is inherently difficult and flawed because preferences change with experience.

Bridget shares that when she helps someone create an advance directive, she tries to understand what experiences are central to their good days—being in the garden, hearing a loved one's voice—and then asks, 'what do we need to get you there?' rather than listing what not to do. BJ adds that the proxy's role is to honor the other person's wishes, which requires a deep conversation, not just a signature. He notes that the job is not to insert one's own will. The speakers also caution that people adapt more than they expect; preferences may shift with illness, so the conversation must be revisited. Peter Attia shares that when asked to be someone's proxy, he insists on a dinner conversation with wine to truly understand their wishes.

Personal experience

Peter Attia: 'I'm very honored to say the the number of people that have asked me to be the decision maker for them... I say the same thing to all of them, which is it's an honor to do it, but we have to sit and talk. Like it's not you can't hand me that stick and just sign my name on there cuz I like we're going to have dinner. We're going to have a bottle of wine. We are going to talk this through. I really need to understand what you want and don't want.'

Advanced directives is very important and you can download a form online like this is a free but you don't need a lawyer to do this. No, you do not need a lawyer to do this.

Also said
“If you had to pick sort of one of the questions that gets asked, it's probably the proxy. If, god forbid, you all of a sudden you're in an accident or something happens and we can't ask you, Peter, what kind of care is important to you? Who do you want speaking on your behalf in such a moment as that?”— Underscores the primacy of proxy selection over specific medical directives.
“I'm more interested in when I have been asked to be in that role to understand you know what what makes this person's life not cuz it's going to perfectly translate like if I can't dance under the full moon in Bali like my life is not enough and you're like okay but what if you could like see the full moon from your bed like is that you know like we we that's a really important point.”— Shows the shift from procedure refusal to positive goals-of-care framing.

Regrets stem from not allowing oneself to feel

The most common thread among dying patients' regrets is not letting themselves feel their emotions or be true to what they felt; shame or other wedges separated them from themselves and others.

Why this matters: Instead of specific regrets like 'worked too much,' the meta-regret of emotional suppression and inauthenticity is what the speakers highlight, emphasizing self-forgiveness over external forgiveness.

Background

BJ notes that the standard regret menu (I worked too much, didn't tell my kids I love them) all share this core theme. The dying often realize they artificially created distance between themselves and everything else.

BJ elaborates that many people spend a lifetime running from fear, but when they accept that fear is natural, it becomes defanged. The same with regret: the lesson isn't to live without regret, but to accept all parts of yourself, even the gnarly stuff. He says, 'to get to feel anything is kind of wild and magical.' This insight leads to the advice to start living honestly now, because people die as they lived. If you want a death with connection and authenticity, practice those muscles today.

What they all seem to have in common is they regret not letting themselves feel or not letting themselves be true to the what they actually felt something got in there shame or something else wedged in themselves and separated themselves from themselves or separated themselves from other people they love.

Also said
“The regret has something to do about artificially or accidentally putting a wedge between you and anything.”— Simplifies the core regret to its essence.
“If you want to be ready to die, well, get real with yourself. The sooner the better.”— Directly ties the dying's regrets to a practical living recommendation.

The dying often need privacy to finally let go

Many hospice workers observe that people frequently wait to be alone—even for the minute a family member steps out—before taking their last breath, suggesting the dying need solitary space to let go.

Why this matters: Loving families often exhaust themselves in vigil, believing presence at the exact moment of death is paramount. This insight flips that: leaving the room may be the most loving act.

Background

Family members frequently don't eat, sleep, or go to the bathroom to avoid missing the final moment. This can lead to their own suffering and may inadvertently keep the dying person tethered.

Bridget notes that this phenomenon is well-known in hospice. She encourages families to take care of their own basic needs and to give permission for the person to die in their absence. BJ adds that it's possibly the thing the dying person needs to finally let go, and that 'you going to the bathroom or taking a walk or stepping in the room may be exactly the thing that that person needs.' The advice is to not impose a vigil that might prolong the struggle.

Personal experience

Bridget: 'I've counseled a lot of people there... people won't get up and go to the bathroom because they don't want to miss that moment. They won't eat, they don't eat... it is a time to be thinking about really basic needs and basic comforts for everyone in the space.'

Go to the bathroom, take a walk, kiss the person goodbye, drink some water, and know that not only they may they may be gone when you come back, but that may be exactly what they needed to finally let go.

Also said
“It just I I don't think any of us could tell you why this is, but it is just a thing. You talk to anyone who worked in hospice for a while, it seems to be that a lot of people need to be alone for the final their final moments on the planet to really let go.”— Validates the observation as a widespread phenomenon.

Recommendations

Products, supplements, and tools mentioned in the episode

1 item

Free online advance directive forms

Practice

The speakers recommend downloading a free advance directive form online as a public service, emphasizing that no lawyer is needed.

Bridget notes that only about 20% of people have an advance directive, even though most agree it's important. The form is legally valid and simple, asking you to name a proxy and state general preferences for life-sustaining treatment. The experts stress that the conversation with the proxy is more important than the form itself, but completing it is a crucial first step to ensure your wishes are legally documented.

vs alternatives

Using a lawyer is unnecessary and often expensive; the free forms are legally sufficient in most states. The key differentiator is completing the conversation, which a lawyer may not facilitate.

Personal experience

Bridget: 'My first advanced directive, I was in my late 20s when I actually finally did it... I was imagining my parents who do not speak to each other, trying to make decisions over their child and my, you know, casual partner at the time... I was like, I don't want that for them regardless of what happens to me and my body.'

Advanced directives is very important and you can download a form online like this is a free but you don't need a lawyer to do this. No, you do not need a lawyer to do this.

Find Free
Disclosed sponsorships1speaker disclosed

Mettle Health

Service Sponsored · disclosed

BJ references Mettle Health as a space where the unit of care truly includes family members, and where about 60% of clients are the family members, not just the patient.

DisclosureBJ is a co-founder of Mettle Health, a service providing psychological and existential support for patients and families outside the traditional healthcare billing model.

BJ explains that in the medical system, although palliative care theoretically treats the patient and family as a unit, it's often impossible to bill for family sessions. Mettle Health was created to make good on that promise, offering therapy and support that insurance doesn't cover but that is desperately needed. The service provides access to palliative care expertise without the constraints of hospice or hospital settings, focusing on the relational, emotional, and existential aspects of serious illness and dying. It also features pediatric palliative care doctors like Chris Adrian.

vs alternatives

Unlike hospital-based palliative care, Mettle Health is not limited by insurance billing codes, so it can explicitly treat the family and provide ongoing psychological support in a way that the current healthcare system typically does not fund.

Personal experience

BJ: 'When I was working in the medical system in the cancer center or anywhere in the medical like you can't bill there's no way to bill for the spouse. So we'd sneak that family into the side door... So there's a lot to say about that and that's another reason why metal I mean probably 60% of our clients are the the family members.'

That's another reason why metal I mean probably 60% of our clients are the the family members because there's just no place no one's asking about their experience to Bridget's point.

Find Mettle

Notable quotes

Lines worth pulling out — contrarian, specific, or perfectly phrased

6 items
Bodies die, living things die. It's uh I think a lot of us absorb a notion of death that it's some foreign invader or something that comes out of the woods and grabs us and otherwise I was just fine and then not. Um no. ... included on the list of natural things that we do is die. So I I you know it is that's what a body is supposed to do. I just want to get that clear. There's nothing wrong with you for dying.
BJ reframes death from an external enemy to an inherent, natural bodily function, removing moral failure.
What they all seem to have in common is they regret not letting themselves feel or not letting themselves be true to the what they actually felt something got in there shame or something else wedged in themselves and separated themselves from themselves or separated themselves from other people they love.
Boils down end-of-life regrets to a single, profound pattern: emotional suppression and inauthenticity.
If there's an experience you would like to happen, if you're imagining into the future, you're like, I think dying in this way would be okay or more tolerable or nice or beautiful, start doing it now. Like you want to forgive, like you're worried about forgiveness, like investigate that now, right?
Bridget crystallizes the episode's actionable takeaway: don't wait until dying to practice the qualities you want in death.
The default modes of our health care system would be just do more stuff. prop your body up anything to give you a pulse unless you've written or stated otherwise. We're going to just try to protect you having a pulse. Most of us don't equate having a pulse with actually really being alive and that becomes a problem at some point.
BJ bluntly critiques the healthcare system's default to maximal intervention, highlighting the chasm between a pulse and a meaningful life.
Part of dying well is also letting go of all the things you can't control. ... the sort of the ability to discern what you can control and focus some efforts there and let go of all the things you can't control. And maybe in the middle identify that even though there are some huge things we can't control, there is a lot we can influence, right?
Links the serenity prayer to dying, emphasizing the spectrum from control to influence to surrender—a practical framework for facing death.
I'm wondering if I should be in palative care right now by the way the reality is paliative care is just good healthcare.
A sharp, meme-able soundbite that challenges the stigma around palliative care, equating it with fundamental, attentive medicine.

Sign in to share feedback

Tell us if this brief hit the mark or missed it — feedback feeds back into the next iteration of the prompt.

Topics covered

death-acceptancepalliative-care-vs-hospiceadvance-directivesopioid-mythsdelirium-end-of-lifesuffering-vs-painregrets-of-the-dyingdying-processhome-hospice-challengesproxy-selectionexistential-sufferingpsilocybinactive-dying-signsdeath-vigilself-forgivenessliving-authenticallyhealthcare-system-defaultsconnection-at-end-of-life
Free account

Make this library yours

Reading is free for everyone. A free account adds the personal layer: save protocols, follow experts, and see how the other experts weigh in on this same topic.

Create a free accountSign in

Where the experts disagree — weekly

One email a week: the sharpest new disagreements and protocols from the library. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Educational summary of the cited expert source — not medical advice. Open the source recording linked above and consult a qualified physician before acting on any protocol.